[SEDONA-629] Change RS Functions to return struct instead of array type #1524
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jiayuasu
requested changes
Jul 17, 2024
...mmon/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sedona_sql/expressions/raster/RasterFunctions.scala
Show resolved
Hide resolved
jiayuasu
approved these changes
Jul 18, 2024
Kontinuation
pushed a commit
to Kontinuation/sedona
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2024
…pe (apache#1524) * [SEDONA-629] Change RS Functions to return struct instead of array type * refactor RS_SummaryStatsAll * refactor RS_ZonalStatsAll * refactor RS_GeoTransform * modify document * update the document for RS_GeoTransform
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Did you read the Contributor Guide?
Is this PR related to a JIRA ticket?
[SEDONA-XXX] my subject.What changes were proposed in this PR?
return structs for the following RS functions using the description as the key and statistic/ metadata name as the value
How was this patch tested?
All relevant existing tests need to be refactored and passed.
Did this PR include necessary documentation updates?