-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dnnl perf issue #605
Dnnl perf issue #605
Conversation
Hi this is to fix the performance issue #591 The issue is very weird and spent a lot time of checking small difference between the example code and our code. the only observation for now is creating dnnl And extra performance testings are added . |
Currently dnnl mnist (60000x1x28x28) train(batch64, epoch1) time is 123sec |
@dcslin I have retested your branch after you recleaned the code. I think this is ready for merge. The CPU mnist cnn result is below: root@71b7b910ae0b:~/dcsysh/singa/examples/autograd# python3 mnist_cnn.py I think the issue #591 is totally resolved after merging this PR. Thanks a lot for your help @dcslin |
No description provided.