Integrate BanyanDB cluster as storage solution #145
Conversation
|
Default values of |
| @@ -39,6 +39,6 @@ dependencies: | |||
| repository: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bitnami/charts/archive-full-index/bitnami | |||
| condition: postgresql.enabled | |||
| - name: skywalking-banyandb-helm | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's rename this to skywalking-banyandb
| version: 0.0.0-8bdff75 | ||
| repository: oci://ghcr.io/apache/skywalking-banyandb-helm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You should point to docker hub, rather than ghcr. Why is this changed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you release 0.2.0 of the banyandb helm?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Meanwhile, where is oci://registry-1.docker.io/apache? Is this repository existing?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We have not yet released banyandb and banyandb-helm, so I temporarily pointed the repository to ghcr. I will update these values together after the releases are completed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We have the previous(0.1.0) version, https://github.com/apache/skywalking-banyandb-helm.
Are you going to release that soon? Otherwise, once skywalking-helm 4.6 is releasing, it will carry the unreleased BanyanDB version(some snapshot version). This is not correct in the ASF.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As far as I know, we will release shortly after the completion of testing on banyandb, and it should be relatively fast.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you post an issue on Helm 4.6.0 milestone to track this, and you should fix this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@hanahmily told me, your deployment should not care about BanyanDB 0.5 or 0.6(dev or unreleased). So, this should not be a blocker for you.
I know 0.6 is much better, so you only need to keep all in 0.5 by default, and upgrade to 0.6 once it is released.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@hanahmily told me, your deployment should not care about BanyanDB 0.5 or 0.6(dev or unreleased). So, this should not be a blocker for you. I know 0.6 is much better, so you only need to keep all in 0.5 by default, and upgrade to 0.6 once it is released.
There is a feature related to etcd authentication that has not been implemented in version 0.5. It seems that we still need to rely on the upcoming BanyanDB 0.6 version. After discussing with @hanahmily , we decide to change these tags later on.
No description provided.