-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-17816] [Core] [Branch-2.0] Fix ConcurrentModificationException issue in BlockStatusesAccumulator #15425
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…kStatusesAccumulator Change the BlockStatusesAccumulator to return immutable object when value method is called. Existing tests plus I verified this change by running a pipeline which consistently repro this issue. This is the stack trace for this exception: ` java.util.ConcurrentModificationException at java.util.ArrayList$Itr.checkForComodification(ArrayList.java:901) at java.util.ArrayList$Itr.next(ArrayList.java:851) at scala.collection.convert.Wrappers$JIteratorWrapper.next(Wrappers.scala:43) at scala.collection.Iterator$class.foreach(Iterator.scala:893) at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:1336) at scala.collection.IterableLike$class.foreach(IterableLike.scala:72) at scala.collection.AbstractIterable.foreach(Iterable.scala:54) at scala.collection.generic.Growable$class.$plus$plus$eq(Growable.scala:59) at scala.collection.mutable.ListBuffer.$plus$plus$eq(ListBuffer.scala:183) at scala.collection.mutable.ListBuffer.$plus$plus$eq(ListBuffer.scala:45) at scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.to(TraversableLike.scala:590) at scala.collection.AbstractTraversable.to(Traversable.scala:104) at scala.collection.TraversableOnce$class.toList(TraversableOnce.scala:294) at scala.collection.AbstractTraversable.toList(Traversable.scala:104) at org.apache.spark.util.JsonProtocol$.accumValueToJson(JsonProtocol.scala:314) at org.apache.spark.util.JsonProtocol$$anonfun$accumulableInfoToJson$5.apply(JsonProtocol.scala:291) at org.apache.spark.util.JsonProtocol$$anonfun$accumulableInfoToJson$5.apply(JsonProtocol.scala:291) at scala.Option.map(Option.scala:146) at org.apache.spark.util.JsonProtocol$.accumulableInfoToJson(JsonProtocol.scala:291) at org.apache.spark.util.JsonProtocol$$anonfun$taskInfoToJson$12.apply(JsonProtocol.scala:283) at org.apache.spark.util.JsonProtocol$$anonfun$taskInfoToJson$12.apply(JsonProtocol.scala:283) at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234) at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:234) at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:381) at scala.collection.generic.TraversableForwarder$class.foreach(TraversableForwarder.scala:35) at scala.collection.mutable.ListBuffer.foreach(ListBuffer.scala:45) at scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.map(TraversableLike.scala:234) at scala.collection.AbstractTraversable.map(Traversable.scala:104) at org.apache.spark.util.JsonProtocol$.taskInfoToJson(JsonProtocol.scala:283) at org.apache.spark.util.JsonProtocol$.taskEndToJson(JsonProtocol.scala:145) at org.apache.spark.util.JsonProtocol$.sparkEventToJson(JsonProtocol.scala:76) ` Author: Ergin Seyfe <eseyfe@fb.com> Closes apache#15371 from seyfe/race_cond_jsonprotocal.
Jenkins, test this please. |
Test build #3321 has finished for PR 15425 at commit
|
srowen
approved these changes
Oct 11, 2016
LGTM. Merging to 2.0. Thanks! |
asfgit
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2016
…ssue in BlockStatusesAccumulator ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? Replaced `BlockStatusesAccumulator` with `CollectionAccumulator` which is thread safe and few more cleanups. ## How was this patch tested? Tested in master branch and cherry-picked. Author: Ergin Seyfe <eseyfe@fb.com> Closes #15425 from seyfe/race_cond_jsonprotocal_branch-2.0.
Closing it since it's merged into 2.0. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replaced
BlockStatusesAccumulator
withCollectionAccumulator
which is thread safe and few more cleanups.How was this patch tested?
Tested in master branch and cherry-picked.