Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-17123][SQL][BRANCH-2.0] Use type-widened encoder for DataFrame for set operations #15601

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR backports #15072

Please note that the test code is a bit different with the master as #14786 was only merged into master and therefore, it does not support type-widening between DateType and TimestampType.

So, both types were taken out from the test.

How was this patch tested?

Unit test in DataFrameSuite.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 23, 2016

Test build #67412 has finished for PR 15601 at commit b233d09.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@hvanhovell
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. Merging to branch-2.0. Could you close this?

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2016
… for set operations

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR backports #15072

Please note that the test code is a bit different with the master as #14786 was only merged into master and therefore, it does not support type-widening between `DateType` and `TimestampType`.

So, both types were taken out from the test.

## How was this patch tested?

Unit test in `DataFrameSuite`.

Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>

Closes #15601 from HyukjinKwon/backport-17123.
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 23, 2016

Test build #67413 has finished for PR 15601 at commit 9154463.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon deleted the backport-17123 branch January 2, 2018 03:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants