-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-28326][SQL][TEST] Port join.sql #25148
Conversation
Test build #107639 has finished for PR 25148 at commit
|
Test build #107645 has finished for PR 25148 at commit
|
Retest this please. |
Test build #108258 has finished for PR 25148 at commit
|
From the PR description, please replace
|
Test build #108332 has finished for PR 25148 at commit
|
It seems like there is no problem in the output (I checked the answers between Spark and PostgreSQL as much as possible though, its too big to check one-by-one...) |
Thank you @maropu |
Test build #108363 has finished for PR 25148 at commit
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is to port join.sql from PostgreSQL regression tests. https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/REL_12_BETA2/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql
The expected results can be found in the link: https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/REL_12_BETA2/src/test/regress/expected/join.out
When porting the test cases, found nine PostgreSQL specific features that do not exist in Spark SQL:
SPARK-27877: ANSI SQL: LATERAL derived table(T491)
SPARK-20856: support statement using nested joins
SPARK-27987: Support POSIX Regular Expressions
SPARK-28382: Array Functions: unnest
SPARK-25411: Implement range partition in Spark
SPARK-28377: Fully support correlation names in the FROM clause
SPARK-28330: Enhance query limit
SPARK-28379: Correlated scalar subqueries must be aggregated
SPARK-16452: basic INFORMATION_SCHEMA support
How was this patch tested?
N/A