-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-32738][CORE][2.4] Should reduce the number of active threads if fatal error happens in Inbox.process
#29764
Conversation
…al error happens in `Inbox.process` ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Processing for `ThreadSafeRpcEndpoint` is controlled by `numActiveThreads` in `Inbox`. Now if any fatal error happens during `Inbox.process`, `numActiveThreads` is not reduced. Then other threads can not process messages in that inbox, which causes the endpoint to "hang". For other type of endpoints, we also should keep `numActiveThreads` correct. This problem is more serious in previous Spark 2.x versions since the driver, executor and block manager endpoints are all thread safe endpoints. To fix this, we should reduce the number of active threads if fatal error happens in `Inbox.process`. ### Why are the changes needed? `numActiveThreads` is not correct when fatal error happens and will cause the described problem. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? Add a new test. Closes apache#29580 from wzhfy/deal_with_fatal_error. Authored-by: Zhenhua Wang <wzh_zju@163.com> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
|
||
val endpointRef = mock(classOf[NettyRpcEndpointRef]) | ||
val dispatcher = mock(classOf[Dispatcher]) | ||
val inbox = new Inbox(endpointRef, endpoint) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here in 2.4 we pass an endpointRef
as parameter instead of a name
in 3.x
Test build #128723 has finished for PR 29764 at commit
|
retest this please |
Test build #128728 has finished for PR 29764 at commit
|
retest this please |
Test build #128791 has finished for PR 29764 at commit
|
retest this please |
Test build #128822 has finished for PR 29764 at commit
|
Finally all tests are passed... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @wzhfy !
…f fatal error happens in `Inbox.process` This is a backport for [pr#29580](#29580) to branch 2.4. ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Processing for `ThreadSafeRpcEndpoint` is controlled by `numActiveThreads` in `Inbox`. Now if any fatal error happens during `Inbox.process`, `numActiveThreads` is not reduced. Then other threads can not process messages in that inbox, which causes the endpoint to "hang". For other type of endpoints, we also should keep `numActiveThreads` correct. This problem is more serious in previous Spark 2.x versions since the driver, executor and block manager endpoints are all thread safe endpoints. To fix this, we should reduce the number of active threads if fatal error happens in `Inbox.process`. ### Why are the changes needed? `numActiveThreads` is not correct when fatal error happens and will cause the described problem. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? Add a new test. Closes #29764 from wzhfy/deal_with_fatal_error_2.4. Authored-by: Zhenhua Wang <wzh_zju@163.com> Signed-off-by: Mridul Muralidharan <mridul<at>gmail.com>
@wzhfy Can you close the PR please ? It has been merged to branch-2.4 |
@mridulm Closed. Thanks! |
This is a backport for pr#29580 to branch 2.4.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Processing for
ThreadSafeRpcEndpoint
is controlled bynumActiveThreads
inInbox
. Now if any fatal error happens duringInbox.process
,numActiveThreads
is not reduced. Then other threads can not process messages in that inbox, which causes the endpoint to "hang". For other type of endpoints, we also should keepnumActiveThreads
correct.This problem is more serious in previous Spark 2.x versions since the driver, executor and block manager endpoints are all thread safe endpoints.
To fix this, we should reduce the number of active threads if fatal error happens in
Inbox.process
.Why are the changes needed?
numActiveThreads
is not correct when fatal error happens and will cause the described problem.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
Add a new test.