[SPARK-34055][SQL][3.0] Refresh cache in ALTER TABLE .. ADD PARTITION
#31116
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Invoke `refreshTable()` from `CatalogImpl` which refreshes the cache in v1 `ALTER TABLE .. ADD PARTITION`. This fixes the issues portrayed by the example: ```sql spark-sql> create table tbl (col int, part int) using parquet partitioned by (part); spark-sql> insert into tbl partition (part=0) select 0; spark-sql> cache table tbl; spark-sql> select * from tbl; 0 0 spark-sql> show table extended like 'tbl' partition(part=0); default tbl false Partition Values: [part=0] Location: file:/Users/maximgekk/proj/add-partition-refresh-cache-2/spark-warehouse/tbl/part=0 ... ``` Create new partition by copying the existing one: ``` $ cp -r /Users/maximgekk/proj/add-partition-refresh-cache-2/spark-warehouse/tbl/part=0 /Users/maximgekk/proj/add-partition-refresh-cache-2/spark-warehouse/tbl/part=1 ``` ```sql spark-sql> alter table tbl add partition (part=1) location '/Users/maximgekk/proj/add-partition-refresh-cache-2/spark-warehouse/tbl/part=1'; spark-sql> select * from tbl; 0 0 ``` The last query must return `0 1` since it has been added by `ALTER TABLE .. ADD PARTITION`. Yes. After the changes for the example above: ```sql ... spark-sql> alter table tbl add partition (part=1) location '/Users/maximgekk/proj/add-partition-refresh-cache-2/spark-warehouse/tbl/part=1'; spark-sql> select * from tbl; 0 0 0 1 ``` By running the affected test suite: ``` $ build/sbt -Phive-2.3 -Phive-thriftserver "test:testOnly *AlterTableAddPartitionSuite" ``` Closes apache#31101 from MaxGekk/add-partition-refresh-cache-2. Lead-authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit e0e06c1) Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
|
Kubernetes integration test starting |
|
Kubernetes integration test status failure |
|
Test build #133897 has finished for PR 31116 at commit
|
|
Merged to branch-3.0. |
HyukjinKwon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 11, 2021
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Invoke `refreshTable()` from `CatalogImpl` which refreshes the cache in v1 `ALTER TABLE .. ADD PARTITION`. ### Why are the changes needed? This fixes the issues portrayed by the example: ```sql spark-sql> create table tbl (col int, part int) using parquet partitioned by (part); spark-sql> insert into tbl partition (part=0) select 0; spark-sql> cache table tbl; spark-sql> select * from tbl; 0 0 spark-sql> show table extended like 'tbl' partition(part=0); default tbl false Partition Values: [part=0] Location: file:/Users/maximgekk/proj/add-partition-refresh-cache-2/spark-warehouse/tbl/part=0 ... ``` Create new partition by copying the existing one: ``` $ cp -r /Users/maximgekk/proj/add-partition-refresh-cache-2/spark-warehouse/tbl/part=0 /Users/maximgekk/proj/add-partition-refresh-cache-2/spark-warehouse/tbl/part=1 ``` ```sql spark-sql> alter table tbl add partition (part=1) location '/Users/maximgekk/proj/add-partition-refresh-cache-2/spark-warehouse/tbl/part=1'; spark-sql> select * from tbl; 0 0 ``` The last query must return `0 1` since it has been added by `ALTER TABLE .. ADD PARTITION`. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes. After the changes for the example above: ```sql ... spark-sql> alter table tbl add partition (part=1) location '/Users/maximgekk/proj/add-partition-refresh-cache-2/spark-warehouse/tbl/part=1'; spark-sql> select * from tbl; 0 0 0 1 ``` ### How was this patch tested? By running the affected test suite: ``` $ build/sbt -Phive-2.3 -Phive-thriftserver "test:testOnly *CachedTableSuite" ``` Closes #31116 from MaxGekk/add-partition-refresh-cache-2-3.0. Authored-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Invoke
refreshTable()fromCatalogImplwhich refreshes the cache in v1ALTER TABLE .. ADD PARTITION.Why are the changes needed?
This fixes the issues portrayed by the example:
Create new partition by copying the existing one:
The last query must return
0 1since it has been added byALTER TABLE .. ADD PARTITION.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. After the changes for the example above:
How was this patch tested?
By running the affected test suite: