Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[SPARK-11434] [SQL] Fix test "SPARK-11103: Filter applied on merged Parquet schema with new column fails" #9387

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[SPARK-11434] [SQL] Fix test "SPARK-11103: Filter applied on merged Parquet schema with new column fails" #9387

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

yhuai
Copy link
Contributor

@yhuai yhuai commented Oct 31, 2015

@yhuai
Copy link
Contributor Author

yhuai commented Oct 31, 2015

This change needs to go in master as well as branch 1.5.

@viirya viirya mentioned this pull request Oct 31, 2015
Closed
@liancheng liancheng mentioned this pull request Oct 31, 2015
Closed
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 31, 2015

Test build #44720 has finished for PR 9387 at commit ef220f2.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@yhuai
Copy link
Contributor Author

yhuai commented Oct 31, 2015

Merging to master and branch 1.5.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 3c47188 Oct 31, 2015
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2015
@yhuai
[SPARK-11434][SPARK-11103][SQL] Fix test ": Filter applied on merged …
c9ac0e9 
…Parquet schema with new column fails"

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11434

Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>

Closes #9387 from yhuai/SPARK-11434.

(cherry picked from commit 3c47188)
Signed-off-by: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@yhuai @SparkQA