Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

STORM-1850: State Checkpointing Documentation update #1433

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

omallassi
Copy link

@arunmahadevan
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ is saved and then the checkpoint tuple is forwarded to the next component. Each
streams before it saves its state so that the state represents a consistent state across the topology. Once the checkpoint spout receives
ACK from all the bolts, the state commit is complete and the transaction is recorded as committed by the checkpoint spout.

The state checkpointing does not currently checkpoint the state of the spout. Yet, once the states of all bolts are checkpointed and once the checkpoint tuples is acked, the tuples emitted by the spout are acked.
It also implies that `topology.state.checkpoint.interval.ms` is lower than `topology.message.timeout.secs`.
Copy link
Contributor

@hmcl hmcl May 19, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

once the STATE of all the bolts are checkpointed, and once the checkpoint tuples ARE acked.... by the spout are ALSO acked.

@hmcl
Copy link
Contributor

hmcl commented May 19, 2016

+1 once some minor grammar suggestions have been addressed.

@omallassi omallassi closed this May 20, 2016
@omallassi omallassi reopened this May 20, 2016
@arunmahadevan
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @omallassi this is merged to master and 1.x-branch.

@HeartSaVioR
Copy link
Contributor

@arunmahadevan Seems like it would be better to apply this to 1.0.x as well. What do you think?

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2016
@arunmahadevan
Copy link
Contributor

@HeartSaVioR thanks for noticing. The changes are now merged to master, 1.x-branch and 1.0.x-branch.

@omallassi thanks for the patch. You may close this PR.

@omallassi omallassi closed this May 23, 2016
bipinprasad pushed a commit to bipinprasad/storm that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants