Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(plugins): Update custom controls for BigNumber with Time Comparison chart #27054

Merged

Conversation

Antonio-RiveroMartnez
Copy link
Member

@Antonio-RiveroMartnez Antonio-RiveroMartnez commented Feb 8, 2024

SUMMARY

In order to help users to navigate the new comparison controls of the plugin we are making the Custom time range part of the query section, also it's only visible if custom range is selected and if so, it's a required field.

BEFORE/AFTER SCREENSHOTS OR ANIMATED GIF

Screen.Recording.2024-02-08.at.21.26.17.mov

TESTING INSTRUCTIONS

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

  • Has associated issue:
  • Required feature flags:
  • Changes UI
  • Includes DB Migration (follow approval process in SIP-59)
    • Migration is atomic, supports rollback & is backwards-compatible
    • Confirm DB migration upgrade and downgrade tested
    • Runtime estimates and downtime expectations provided
  • Introduces new feature or API
  • Removes existing feature or API

- Move the Custom filters controls into the query section
- Custom filter is visible only if Custom range is selected and if so it's required
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 7 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (fd06ff3) 67.19% compared to head (a47a15a) 67.18%.

Files Patch % Lines
...-period-over-period-kpi/src/plugin/controlPanel.ts 12.50% 7 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #27054      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   67.19%   67.18%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1899     1899              
  Lines       74369    74377       +8     
  Branches     8274     8276       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        49970    49971       +1     
- Misses      22344    22351       +7     
  Partials     2055     2055              
Flag Coverage Δ
javascript 56.89% <12.50%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@betodealmeida betodealmeida left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lovely!

@rusackas
Copy link
Member

rusackas commented Feb 8, 2024

/testenv up

1 similar comment
@mistercrunch
Copy link
Member

/testenv up

@Antonio-RiveroMartnez
Copy link
Member Author

/testenv up FEATURE_CHART_PLUGINS_EXPERIMENTAL=true

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2024

@Antonio-RiveroMartnez Ephemeral environment spinning up at http://52.26.224.231:8080. Credentials are admin/admin. Please allow several minutes for bootstrapping and startup.

@Antonio-RiveroMartnez Antonio-RiveroMartnez merged commit 435cd27 into apache:master Feb 12, 2024
34 of 35 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

Ephemeral environment shutdown and build artifacts deleted.

sadpandajoe pushed a commit to preset-io/superset that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2024
sfirke pushed a commit to sfirke/superset that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2024
@mistercrunch mistercrunch added 🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels 🚢 4.0.0 labels Apr 17, 2024
vinothkumar66 pushed a commit to vinothkumar66/superset that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels plugins size/M 🚢 4.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants