-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 424
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TEZ-4311: Bump hadoop dependency version to 3.3.x #132
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hey, just FYI. I came across this issue when upgrading Hive 3.3.1: Probably needs to be handled by Tez unless HADOOP-17779 is accepted (and released in a subsequent version). |
@abstractdog, if we are to start hadoop 3.3 changes we should consider branching branch-0.10. Here's a thought. Instead of calling it 0.11 for hadoop 3.3 support, what if we change version on master to 3.3 to reflect hadoop compatibility. |
I like the idea, especially because tez is battle-tested and stable for a very long time, deserves more than 0.x |
Hey Guys, I would be careful hitching the wagon to any other projects. I think it's helpful to be on your own release cadence. However, I think 1.0 is a good first step and would lead the way to some more thoughtful approach to backwards compatibility and stableness (not that these things aren't true now, but it make it more formalized for new folks). Thanks. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
new failures are found in ShuffleHandler while running tests:
full log file is attached to JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13035409/org.apache.tez.auxservices.TestShuffleHandler-output.txt |
64cb83e
to
2814d76
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
2814d76
to
7ec26a2
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
current unit test failure is reproduced as:
related to YARN-9554, it's under investigation |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
@jteagles: could you please take a look at the commits? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1. I feel we are ready for this change. Probably we should plan a release once we can certify
thanks @jteagles, I'm about to commit this soon
|
No description provided.