[Docker][ROCm] Add minimal ROCm docker #7422
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
leandron
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2021
|
@leandron The motivation is that I have been trying out TVM with ROCm and it took me a bit of time to put the necessary pieces together so I think this improves usability and might allow users to get started more quickly. Next to this, I also think it would be useful to have a tutorial on using TVM with ROCm as there isn't too much material on that. |
|
Yeah, fair enough. I guess we can merge this @tqchen, maybe? |
masahi
approved these changes
Feb 12, 2021
Lokiiiiii
pushed a commit
to Lokiiiiii/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2021
trevor-m
pushed a commit
to neo-ai/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a minimal docker for using TVM with ROCm.
@adityaatluri @leandron , could you please help with reviewing this PR