[Topi] Fix direct SIMD conv2d schedule name

[mehrdadh]

This PR rename schedule name by adding input layout to it.

[mehrdadh]

cc @areusch , @sergey-grovety

[areusch]

@mehrdadh let's merge this, i think this is a step in the right direction; however, i think we should actually further rename this. i'm not settled yet on what the new name should be. some thoughts:

• direct_simd should probably just become something like smlad
• micro_dev should probably become arm_cpu_v8m or something along those lines.

though we purport to match on the ISA associated with -mcpu, we don't do this very aggressively yet. and, i'm not sure if we have a pattern in schedule names in here to distinguish between various ISA.

cc @u99127 @manupa-arm @Mousius if you guys have ideas on ways you'd like to organize arm_cpu schedules between Cortex-A and Cortex-M

[areusch]

also it's worth pointing out that we would avoid merging incremental name cleanups in the future (as this would invalidate autotuning logs), but since Cortex-M autotuning is still getting off the ground I think it's ok this time.

[mehrdadh]

@areusch I agree that we should come up with a naming system at least for microTVM at the moment if not possible for all schedules. I suggest we settle down on something before merging #9233.
I prefer something related to ISA and if it is only for certain ARM cores, I suggest to add something to indicate that.