Adding pretty JSON

[obihann]

• addition of prettyjson to src/prettyify-response.coffee so that body and schema objects that are of content type `application/json' are easier to read
• update to how we check content type, since types such as application/json; charset=utf-8 are valid we should not do an exact match on application/json and instead do an indexOf
• allowing schemaBody to be passed through prettyjson along with schema

[honzajavorek]

@obihann I'm sorry we did not respond for a longer time 😰 Thanks for your work! 👍 As master is fixed now, would you mind to rebase with it and try whether tests pass?

[honzajavorek]

And since you're already touching the content type logic in your PR, I'd prefer if it would be able to deal also with content types such as application/hal+json, application/vnd.geo+json and similar ones. What do you think?

[obihann]

@honzajavorek sure, I'll rebase this and see how it goes. I'll also try to add those content types in.

[honzajavorek]

@obihann Awesome! If I may provide hints, I'd use media-typer for the heavy lifting.

[netmilk]

Looking forward @obihann! Thanks a lot for all your contributions!

[honzajavorek]

I think we should incorporate this as part of #765.

[honzajavorek]

I'm very sorry we were not able to get back to this. I need to close this as we're going to work on #705 first, which requires having no pending Pull Requests. We'll get back to this proposal as soon as we're revamping the CLI reporter: #765

Thanks for all the work! I'll do my best for this contribution not to be forgotten!

[revett]

@honzajavorek Have you come back to this feature yet?

[honzajavorek]

@revett We thought about revamping the whole CLI reporter: #765

[revett]

@honzajavorek Ah okay 👍That seems like quite a large piece of work but this issue is a simple fix. If I put in a PR for this, would it be merged before #765?

[honzajavorek]

Yes, that would be nice!