Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace SHOW/Describe and internal schema with rewrite, and database #57

Closed
8 tasks done
araddon opened this issue Dec 27, 2015 · 0 comments · Fixed by #68
Closed
8 tasks done

Replace SHOW/Describe and internal schema with rewrite, and database #57

araddon opened this issue Dec 27, 2015 · 0 comments · Fixed by #68
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@araddon
Copy link
Owner

araddon commented Dec 27, 2015

The SHOW/Describe code is not great. Replace it with query-rewrite, so that show statements become normal Select statements that operate against normal data sources.

  • frontends (such as mysql) need to be able to over-ride default behavior of "Writers" so that dialect specific is builtin

TODO

  • implement more of the schema in normal datastore type backends
  • the plan.Context will need to use a different schema from connection, ensure the plan.Context.Schema is used not any connection specific ones throughout.
  • rewrite show statements to select statements to utilize the build-select which has better where/filter support
  • WHERE/LIKE filters : variables like '%xyz' add where-clause support for show/describe
  • variables (implement session)
  • ensure all downstream show, describe's work in dataux
    • fix horrible datasource/registry
  • resolve the new required schema dependency issue that breaks literal queries and unit test in plan
@araddon araddon added this to the Current milestone Feb 28, 2016
@araddon araddon self-assigned this Feb 28, 2016
araddon pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 5, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant