Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improved ts config, fixed types, insttead of PR 404 #407

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JustFly1984
Copy link

🚨 IMPORTANT: Please do not create a Pull Request without creating an issue first.

Any change needs to be discussed before proceeding. Failure to do so may result in the rejection of
the pull request.

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant
motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Related # (issue) #402

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as
    expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

Screenshots/Sandbox (if appropriate/relevant):

Adding links to sandbox or providing screenshots can help us understand more about this PR and take
action on it as appropriate

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can
reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Test A
  • Test B

Test Environment:

  • OS:
  • package-name:
  • NodeJS:

Checklist:

  • I have followed the
    CONTRIBUTING doc and the
    style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests and linter rules pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by explaining why you chose
the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

@JustFly1984
Copy link
Author

@beerose some issues with yarn install

@JustFly1984
Copy link
Author

I've updated eslint plugins versions only

@JustFly1984
Copy link
Author

@beerose please approve 5 workflows

@JustFly1984
Copy link
Author

@ardatan @beerose please approve

@JustFly1984
Copy link
Author

@ardatan @beerose now it is something with CI/CD env variables...

@JustFly1984
Copy link
Author

I've created a PR in ardatan/whatwg-node#391 to fix extends conflict.

@JustFly1984
Copy link
Author

@beerose @ardatan please approve

@JustFly1984
Copy link
Author

@ardatan @beerose please approve. It is weird, that new issues coming up. I'm definitely checking everything with yarn ts:check before committing.

@JustFly1984
Copy link
Author

@ardatan @beerose something with env variables again

@JustFly1984
Copy link
Author

@ardatan @beerose resolved conflicts

@TuvalSimha TuvalSimha closed this Aug 4, 2023
@TuvalSimha TuvalSimha reopened this Aug 4, 2023
@beerose
Copy link
Collaborator

beerose commented Aug 7, 2023

@JustFly1984 I see some checks are failing — could you take a look at it?

@JustFly1984
Copy link
Author

JustFly1984 commented Aug 7, 2023

@beerose @ardatan error: PULUMI_ACCESS_TOKEN must be set for login during non-interactive CLI sessions

I'm not sure why env variables are missing. Not a part of my changes.

@ardatan
Copy link
Owner

ardatan commented Aug 7, 2023

We need to skip e2e workflows for forks in the workflow configuration because they use env vars that are unavailable to forks. So it is ok to ignore them for now.

Besides that, I think this PR is blocked by the one in whatwg-node right?
Because this is not expected.
https://github.com/ardatan/feTS/pull/407/files#diff-42c1d4716dbb2d085d517720a6e1dc424abac44a90ca85dc940b5619f6108054R123

@JustFly1984
Copy link
Author

@ardatan you are correct, we have to resolve whatwg-node issue first.

@JustFly1984
Copy link
Author

@ardatan @beerose I've fixed merge conflicts

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants