Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deploy logic fix #47

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 26, 2018
Merged

Conversation

gwenchee
Copy link
Collaborator

@gwenchee gwenchee commented Sep 17, 2018

This PR fixes the bugs in the #40 PR. And addresses #38 and #23

@gwenchee gwenchee added the bug label Sep 17, 2018
@gwenchee gwenchee self-assigned this Sep 17, 2018
@gwenchee
Copy link
Collaborator Author

When this PR is merged, the correct-develop branch can be merged into develop

@@ -184,7 +191,7 @@ def deploy_solver(self, commod, diff):
Paramters:
----------
commod: str
commodity to deploy the prototypes for
commodity to deploy
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We aren't deploying a commodity here. I agree my original wording is lacking, but I'm not sure this is better.

Maybe "commodity being tracked"?

whatever.sh Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
rm -rf build
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this file should not be in the git repo. You can add it to the git ignore if you'd like and keep it locally though.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh oops, will remove it.

@jbae11
Copy link
Collaborator

jbae11 commented Sep 20, 2018

@FlanFlanagan reflected your comments!

@gwenchee
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@FlanFlanagan @jbae11 are we ready to merge this?

@FlanFlanagan
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good. But can we remove the print statements?

@gwenchee
Copy link
Collaborator Author

will do!

@gwenchee
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I have removed the print statements! Merging now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants