Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow Regex to declare nodes for bgp peer groups/bgp peers to apply to all L3LEAFs instead of needing to define each one. #3973

Open
1 task done
bdugg21 opened this issue May 8, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
state: stale type: enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@bdugg21
Copy link

bdugg21 commented May 8, 2024

Enhancement summary

When defining nodes for bgp peer groups and bgp peers within my tenant there needs to be the ability to use regex to match all l3leafs instead of defining each one.

Which component of AVD is impacted

eos_designs

Use case example

can't define each l3leaf node when there will be 50+ per site.

Describe the solution you would like

regex match l3l_site1-.*

Describe alternatives you have considered

defining each leaf under the nodes.

Additional context

No response

Contributing Guide

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
@bdugg21 bdugg21 added the type: enhancement New feature or request label May 8, 2024
@ClausHolbechArista
Copy link
Contributor

Until we have this, you can use inline jinja to produce the list of nodes.

@ClausHolbechArista
Copy link
Contributor

Peer groups will automatically be pulled into the devices where there is a neighbor using it, so you can save a bit of maintenance there :)

@bdugg21
Copy link
Author

bdugg21 commented Jun 3, 2024 via email

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 6, 2024

This issue is stale because it has been open 90 days with no activity. The issue will be reviewed by a maintainer and may be closed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
state: stale type: enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants