Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not build assembly jar-with-dependencies by default #175

Closed
victornoel opened this issue May 27, 2020 · 17 comments
Closed

Do not build assembly jar-with-dependencies by default #175

victornoel opened this issue May 27, 2020 · 17 comments

Comments

@victornoel
Copy link
Contributor

Running mvn verify -Pqulice is extremely long because of the task make-assembly.

It shouldn't be enabled in a normal build but only via a profile.

I suppose the CI should take that into account also (depending on where this jar is needed).

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented May 27, 2020

@g4s8/z please, pay attention to this issue

@g4s8
Copy link
Member

g4s8 commented May 27, 2020

@0crat assign @marceloamadeu

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented May 27, 2020

@0crat assign @marceloamadeu (here)

@g4s8 The job #175 assigned to @marceloamadeu/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be a monetary reward for this job

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Jun 1, 2020

@marceloamadeu/z this job was assigned to you 5days ago. It will be taken away from you soon, unless you close it, see §8. Read this and this, please.

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Jun 6, 2020

The user @marceloamadeu/z resigned from #175, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: It is older than 10 days, see §8

g4s8 added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 8, 2020
#175 - Do not build assembly jar-with-dependencies
@marceloamadeu
Copy link
Contributor

@g4s8 please close ... tks

@victornoel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@marceloamadeu I will close, but do you realise you have been unassigned from this job? Ask @g4s8 to add you again before I close, so that you can get paid for it…

@marceloamadeu
Copy link
Contributor

@victornoel Yes, I realize that it is not assigned to me...
@g4s8 Is it possible to add me again before closing?

Tks

@victornoel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@marceloamadeu I usually tell 0crat to wait once I have made a PR for a ticket, so that this situation does not happen :) For example: #120 (comment)

@g4s8
Copy link
Member

g4s8 commented Jun 8, 2020

@0crat assign @marceloamadeu

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Jun 8, 2020

@0crat assign @marceloamadeu (here)

@g4s8 The job #175 assigned to @marceloamadeu/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be a monetary reward for this job

@victornoel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@g4s8 @marceloamadeu 👍

@marceloamadeu
Copy link
Contributor

@victornoel @g4s8 Tks 👍

@0crat 0crat added the qa label Jun 8, 2020
@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Jun 8, 2020

Job was finished in 0 hours, bonus for fast delivery is possible (see §36)

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Jun 8, 2020

There is an unrecoverable failure on my side. Please, submit it here:

PID: 4@ee0a5bef-126a-4a0b-9365-89a9ee5abc02, thread: PQ-CT2E6TK9B
com.jcabi.xml.StrictXML[124] java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: 1 error(s) in XML document: -1:-1: Duplicate unique value [gh:artipie/artipie#175] declared for identity constraint of element "speed".

0.53.15: CID: 629442c7-3e14-4e89-a625-5bf205ac5193, Type: "Order was finished"

@0crat 0crat removed the scope label Jun 8, 2020
@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Jun 8, 2020

@sereshqua/z please review this job completed by @marceloamadeu/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

@sereshqua
Copy link

@0crat quality good

@0crat 0crat added quality/good and removed qa labels Jun 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants