-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
L2 reg problem #253
L2 reg problem #253
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## development #253 +/- ##
===============================================
- Coverage 94.91% 94.58% -0.34%
===============================================
Files 66 66
Lines 3619 3619
===============================================
- Hits 3435 3423 -12
- Misses 184 196 +12
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Luke-Pratley if you're happy this works then I don't see any obvious issues. Have you got an example of how someone would call this in practise?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems fine @Luke-Pratley
Adding forward backward and primal dual solvers for the unconstrained and constrained l2 problems.
Should really add primal dual for unconstrained l1 and l2 problem.
Need to add tests in principle for these solvers (even though the underlying algos have tests that they converge)