Add missing copy_options and file_options for snowflake native transfers

[sunank200]

Description

What is the current behavior?

This PR missed the native transfers arguments for snowflake to azure transfers in main

closes: #1708

What is the new behavior?

• Add missing copy_options and file_options for snowflake native transfers for azure tests

Does this introduce a breaking change?

No

Checklist

• Created tests which fail without the change (if possible)
• Extended the README / documentation, if necessary

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 97.72% // Head: 97.72% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (18cd23a) compared to base (5aa43eb).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1707   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.72%   97.72%           
=======================================
  Files          21       21           
  Lines         835      835           
=======================================
  Hits          816      816           
  Misses         19       19           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[tatiana]

@sunank200 I'm slightly worried that it examples, for which we control the data, requestor the on error continue flag. Would it be possible for us to review this in a separate ticket/PR? My feeling is tha this should be the exception and not the rule.

I'm happy for the PR to be merged once the checks pass :)

[sunank200]

@sunank200 I'm slightly worried that it examples, for which we control the data, requestor the on error continue flag. Would it be possible for us to review this in a separate ticket/PR? My feeling is tha this should be the exception and not the rule.

I'm happy for the PR to be merged once the checks pass :)

@tatiana Currently we are passing ON_ERROR=CONTINUE as its failing for the header. We can also pass SKIP_HEADER=1

[sunank200]

@sunank200 I'm slightly worried that it examples, for which we control the data, requestor the on error continue flag. Would it be possible for us to review this in a separate ticket/PR? My feeling is tha this should be the exception and not the rule.

I'm happy for the PR to be merged once the checks pass :)

Also, CI is failing for unrelated issues for databricks tests which can be done in a separate ticket. The rest of the tests has passed. So merging this PR