Handle soft fail

[pankajastro]

closes: #1170
Handle soft_fail param for sensor

TODO

• run test on astro

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (83957b8) 98.57% compared to head (a95e91a) 98.57%.
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1276   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.57%   98.57%           
=======================================
  Files          90       91    +1     
  Lines        5393     5403   +10     
=======================================
+ Hits         5316     5326   +10     
  Misses         77       77           

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
astronomer/providers/amazon/aws/sensors/batch.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
astronomer/providers/amazon/aws/sensors/emr.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...r/providers/amazon/aws/sensors/redshift_cluster.py	92.59% <100.00%> (-7.41%)	⬇️
astronomer/providers/amazon/aws/sensors/s3.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...er/providers/apache/hive/sensors/hive_partition.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
astronomer/providers/core/sensors/external_task.py	95.83% <100.00%> (+0.08%)	⬆️
astronomer/providers/dbt/cloud/sensors/dbt.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ronomer/providers/google/cloud/sensors/bigquery.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
astronomer/providers/google/cloud/sensors/gcs.py	94.80% <100.00%> (+2.49%)	⬆️
astronomer/providers/http/sensors/http.py	85.71% <100.00%> (+0.52%)	⬆️
... and 5 more

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[phanikumv]

LGTM,please test it on our deployments just to rule out any regression

[Lee-W]

Should we add test cases to soft_fail?

[pankajastro]

Should we add test cases to soft_fail?

Added some unit tests