Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Powerlaw model #1184

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 14, 2013
Merged

Powerlaw model #1184

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 14, 2013

Conversation

nden
Copy link
Contributor

@nden nden commented Jun 13, 2013

Trying to finalize PowerlawModel

keflavich and others added 3 commits June 13, 2013 10:28
Old commits:
* fix models reference in test and use super to init
* needed to add powerlaw to __all__
* need to use parameters.Parameter
* power law model only takes 2 pars
* tests still fail, but the error no longer makes any sense
* fixed the tests.  Sigh.
* skip test if no scipy
* use the derivative!
* corrected deriv function (was correct at some time earlier; must have
forgotten to pull...)
@keflavich
Copy link
Contributor

Changes look good to me. I closed #1048 in favor of this.

@nden
Copy link
Contributor Author

nden commented Jun 13, 2013

One of the builds failed for reasons unrelated to the changes. Should Travis be restarted and if so how?

@eteq
Copy link
Member

eteq commented Jun 14, 2013

@nden - the best way to get them restarted is to use @eteq or @astrofrog... that is, as far as I can tell (at least the last time I looked a few months ago), we're the only ones that can restart builds, because we're the repo owners.

Anyway, I restarted it now - as you surmised I think it wasn't any sort of real error.

nden added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2013
@nden nden merged commit 60a27a7 into astropy:master Jun 14, 2013
@nden nden deleted the powerlaw-model branch April 30, 2018 12:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants