Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Showcase the ecosystem #660

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2020
Merged

Conversation

mehcode
Copy link
Contributor

@mehcode mehcode commented Jan 7, 2020

I think it would be a good idea to start calling out crates that you can use with async-std to accomplish tasks that come up in web development: TLS, WebSockets, Web Server, Web Client, Database, etc.

README.md Outdated
@@ -120,6 +120,18 @@ documentation] on how to enable them.
[cargo-add]: https://github.com/killercup/cargo-edit
[features documentation]: https://docs.rs/async-std/#features

## Ecosystem

* [async-native-tls](https://crates.io/crates/async-native-tls) — Native **TLS** for Async. Native TLS for futures and async-std.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You might also want to add async-tls here :) https://crates.io/crates/async-tls

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done. It sure would be nice to be able to universally configure stuff like "which TLS back-end do I want" at a global level in Cargo.toml and stuff like those two crates can merge and not care about stuff like mutually exclusive feature flags.

Copy link
Contributor

@yoshuawuyts yoshuawuyts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks great. Thanks heaps!

@yoshuawuyts yoshuawuyts merged commit 1f78efe into async-rs:master Jan 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants