Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do we need merging raster functions to include EDGAR? #5

Closed
ibarraespinosa opened this issue Dec 6, 2017 · 8 comments
Closed

Do we need merging raster functions to include EDGAR? #5

ibarraespinosa opened this issue Dec 6, 2017 · 8 comments

Comments

@ibarraespinosa
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@ibarraespinosa
Copy link
Member Author

EDGAR and other emissions inventories are not updated regularly and merging emissions with different years it is not the best and it is actually better than nothing. Therefore, a new package is required that allows obtaining the same results tan EDGAR and other models such as GFED, locally with local data. This new package will be named sein: Stationary Emissions Inventory, for stationary sources

@Schuch666
Copy link
Collaborator

EmissV have a new funcion 'read()' to read EDGAR 3.2.1 emissions in .nc

@Schuch666
Copy link
Collaborator

the answer probably is: no

@ibarraespinosa
Copy link
Member Author

ibarraespinosa commented Feb 7, 2018 via email

@Schuch666
Copy link
Collaborator

there is no read() function in the base, but there is no problem if other package wave a function with the same name

@ibarraespinosa
Copy link
Member Author

ibarraespinosa commented Feb 7, 2018 via email

@Schuch666
Copy link
Collaborator

the plan is read various type of data and return a matrix/array (directly from the .nc file) or a raster suitable to rasterSource

for now, only "EDGAR 4.3.1" is supported:
read(file, version = "EDGAR 4.3.1", as_raster = T, verbose = T)

@ibarraespinosa
Copy link
Member Author

superseded by EmissV::read. I'm closing this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants