Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add new network case of attach user type interface #5624

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2024
Merged

Add new network case of attach user type interface #5624

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2024

Conversation

chloerh
Copy link
Contributor

@chloerh chloerh commented May 20, 2024

  • VIRT-296615 - [attach-device][user][slirp] attach-device with user type interface

Test result:

 (1/2) type_specific.io-github-autotest-libvirt.virtual_network.attach_device.user_type_iface.root_user: PASS (63.72 s)
 (2/2) type_specific.io-github-autotest-libvirt.virtual_network.attach_device.user_type_iface.non_root_user: PASS (69.04 s)
RESULTS    : PASS 2 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT 0 | CANCEL 0

@chloerh
Add new network case of attach user type interface
29dd0cd 
- VIRT-296615 - [attach-device][user][slirp] attach-device with user type
interface

Signed-off-by: Haijiao Zhao <haizhao@redhat.com>
dzhengfy
dzhengfy approved these changes Jul 8, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@dzhengfy dzhengfy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dzhengfy dzhengfy merged commit b08b61d into autotest:master Jul 8, 2024
5 checks passed
@chloerh chloerh deleted the attach-user branch July 8, 2024 11:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Yingshun Yingshun Yingshun approved these changes

@dzhengfy dzhengfy dzhengfy approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@chloerh @dzhengfy @Yingshun