Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(ci): ignore perception/bytetrack/lib in spell-check-partial #4517

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 7, 2023

Conversation

HansRobo
Copy link
Member

@HansRobo HansRobo commented Aug 4, 2023

Description

Ignore cspell errors in perception/bytetrack/lib, because the files are from external source and we want to keep the spell errors as a kind of bug-compatibility.

Tests performed

Not applicable.

Effects on system behavior

Not applicable.

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

  • There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

@HansRobo HansRobo requested a review from kminoda August 4, 2023 02:06
@HansRobo HansRobo added the tag:run-build-and-test-differential Mark to enable build-and-test-differential workflow. (used-by-ci) label Aug 4, 2023
@HansRobo HansRobo enabled auto-merge (squash) August 4, 2023 02:09
@kminoda kminoda requested a review from manato August 4, 2023 02:10
Copy link
Contributor

@kminoda kminoda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!! Let me also add @manato as a reviewer, as he is the maintainer of the package.

.cspell-partial.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.cspell-partial.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@kminoda kminoda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for being late. LGTM!

But let me confirm someone who's in charge of this package: @manato @miursh @Shin-kyoto
Could you review this PR for us?

--
I think there were some options to address this bytetrack spell-check issue.

  1. Ignore some part of bytetrack <- this PR
  2. Add a dedicated dictionary for this package
  3. Fix all the spell-checks (discarding the upstream compatibility)

Would be great if you could share some rationale behind the decision among these as well 🙏 (Happy to consult with these options in detail in person if necessary)

Copy link
Contributor

@miursh miursh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ignoring ported library of bytetrack is good idea.
I think T4 perception team has discussed and agrees with this option since the codes in bytetrack/lib/ are all copied from https://github.com/ifzhang/ByteTrack.
Fixing spells in it is low priority because it is not essential.

@HansRobo HansRobo merged commit c889d94 into autowarefoundation:main Aug 7, 2023
20 checks passed
@HansRobo HansRobo deleted the ignore-bytetrack branch August 7, 2023 02:45
LeoDriveProject pushed a commit to leo-drive/autoware.universe.golf that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2023
…towarefoundation#4517)

* chore(ci): ignore perception/bytetrack/lib in spell-check-partial

* style(pre-commit): autofix

---------

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
tag:run-build-and-test-differential Mark to enable build-and-test-differential workflow. (used-by-ci)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants