fix(elasticsearch): 'r6gd' not marked as supported type for instance storage #14894
Conversation
According to https://aws.amazon.com/elasticsearch-service/pricing/ it's now supported
|
|
|
Title does not follow the guidelines of Conventional Commits. Please adjust title before merge. |
ofirnk
changed the title
|
@iliapolo Checks are green ✔️ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please also add to the assertion on line 1457 that R6GD instance types do not support EBS (from https://docs.aws.amazon.com/elasticsearch-service/latest/developerguide/aes-supported-instance-types.html)
BenChaimberg
changed the title
mergify
bot
dismissed
BenChaimberg’s stale review
Pull request has been modified.
|
Validate PR ci looks lost in cloud space.. any way to rerun it? |
|
Merge? |
BenChaimberg
changed the title
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
…storage (aws#14894) According to https://aws.amazon.com/elasticsearch-service/pricing/ it's now supported . Fixes aws#14773 ---- *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
According to https://aws.amazon.com/elasticsearch-service/pricing/ it's now supported .
Fixes #14773
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license