Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Converted "amount" datatype from String to numeric for "Transaction" vertices #489

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 18, 2023

Conversation

spmallette
Copy link
Contributor

Can't think of a reason for "amount" to be non-numeric. Would be nice to be able to do sum() and or different equality functions on that property value as a number.

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

spmallette and others added 2 commits May 16, 2023 11:41
* Pin JupyterLab<4.x

* Update changelog

---------

Co-authored-by: Michael Chin <chnmch@amazon.com>
@krlawrence
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks Stephen. Would like to get a very quick review from @iansrobinson who I believe created the dataset to make sure there was no specific reason why strings were used.

iansrobinson
iansrobinson previously approved these changes May 18, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@iansrobinson iansrobinson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was likely a numeric in the original, so no issues restoring it to a numeric.

@michaelnchin michaelnchin merged commit 94d04bf into main May 18, 2023
@michaelnchin michaelnchin deleted the fraud-numeric branch May 26, 2023 00:06
michaelnchin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 30, 2023
…vertices (#489)

* Converted "amount" datatype from String to numeric for "Transaction" vertices
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants