Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

append filename to completion log file format #3

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

append filename to completion log file format #3

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

chrismeyersfsu
Copy link

write_lat_log file format changed to append the filename for which the request is for.

@chrismeyersfsu
Copy link
Author

Ping. Added support for configuration parameter. Ready to be merged.

axboe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2015
fio does not provide any possibility to verify checksum of a block with meta
information inside. You can create configuration for verifincation checksum
of random data either you can verify meta information with some pattern or
random data, but not both.

Why checksumming and meta together can be useful? Meta helps to figure out internally
on filesystem or storage what block was written in case of corruption, i.e. offset
of the block and block number explicitly tell us the virtual address of the block.
On the other hand checksum of random data helps to detect corruption. Using meta
and pattern together do not help a lot, since 'verify_interval' can be big enough
and same sequence of pattern bytes will be undistinguishable internally on filesystem
or storage.

Also, it seems to me that keeping meta header separately from generic verify header
does not make a lot of sense, since generic verify header can include all members
of meta header without any performance or other impact.

In this patch I move all members from vhdr_meta structure to generic verify_header,
always verifying meta with the possiblity to checksum the following data: random
or pattern.

You are allowed to specify verify_pattern=str with any of the possible verification
methods and have also meta verification, i.e.

   verify=md5
   verify_pattern=0xfe

 or

   verify=sha1
   verify_pattern=0xff

 etc.

To keep everything compatible with old configurations it is still possible to specify

   verify=meta

but this option marked and depricated and kept only for compatibility reasons.

Before that patch the verification layout according to the specified options looks
as the following, e.g.:

 #1
    --
    verify=meta
    verify_pattern=0xff
    --

    result layout of each block: [hdr|meta|pattern]

 #2
    --
    verify_pattern=0xff
    --

    result layout of each block: [hdr|pattern]

 #3
    --
    verify=pattern
    verify_pattern=0xff
    --

    result layout of each block: [pattern]

After applying of the patch 'vhdr_meta' is always embedded into 'verify_header' and layout
looks as the following, e.g.:

 #1
    --
    verify=meta
    verify_pattern=0xff
    --

    result layout of each block: [hdr+meta|pattern]
 #2
    --
    verify=md5|sha1|etc
    verify_pattern=0xff
    --

    result layout of each block: [hdr+meta|cksum|pattern]

 #3
    --
    verify_pattern=0xff
    --

    result layout of each block: [hdr+meta|pattern]

 #4
    --
    verify=pattern
    verify_pattern=0xff
    --

    result layout of each block: [pattern]

Signed-off-by: Roman Pen <r.peniaev@gmail.com>
Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
@dmonakhov dmonakhov mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2016
sitsofe added a commit to sitsofe/fio that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2017
fio on Windows with a large number of CPUs/cores frequently fails while running

./fio --cpuclock-test

even though "reliable_tsc: yes" is reported. Using clang's thread sanitizer via

CC=clang ./configure --extra-cflags="-fsanitize=thread"

and running the same on Linux also generates multiple warnings similar to the
following on a VM with 16 cores:

WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=23780)
  Atomic write of size 4 at 0x7ffecb865a3c by thread T15 (mutexes: write M169):
    #0 __tsan_atomic32_fetch_add /home/clang-3.9/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interface_atomic.cc:591 (fio+0x000000471505)
    axboe#1 atomic32_inc_return /home/fio/gettime.c:567:13 (fio+0x0000004c56c1)
    axboe#2 clock_thread_fn /home/fio/gettime.c:607 (fio+0x0000004c56c1)

  Previous read of size 4 at 0x7ffecb865a3c by thread T4 (mutexes: write M147):
    #0 clock_thread_fn /home/fio/gettime.c:611:19 (fio+0x0000004c56e2)

  Location is stack of main thread.

  Mutex M169 (0x7d700000f6a0) created at:
    #0 pthread_mutex_init /home/clang-3.9/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors.cc:1119 (fio+0x00000043b695)
    axboe#1 fio_monotonic_clocktest /home/fio/gettime.c:694:3 (fio+0x0000004c4c12)
    axboe#2 parse_cmd_line /home/fio/init.c:2710:15 (fio+0x0000004ce8e5)
    axboe#3 parse_options /home/fio/init.c:2828:14 (fio+0x0000004cf3da)
    axboe#4 main /home/fio/fio.c:47:6 (fio+0x00000054b991)

  Mutex M147 (0x7d700000f178) created at:
    #0 pthread_mutex_init /home/clang-3.9/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors.cc:1119 (fio+0x00000043b695)
    axboe#1 fio_monotonic_clocktest /home/fio/gettime.c:694:3 (fio+0x0000004c4c12)
    axboe#2 parse_cmd_line /home/fio/init.c:2710:15 (fio+0x0000004ce8e5)
    axboe#3 parse_options /home/fio/init.c:2828:14 (fio+0x0000004cf3da)
    axboe#4 main /home/fio/fio.c:47:6 (fio+0x00000054b991)

  Thread T15 (tid=23796, running) created by main thread at:
    #0 pthread_create /home/clang-3.9/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors.cc:902 (fio+0x00000042c9a6)
    axboe#1 fio_monotonic_clocktest /home/fio/gettime.c:697:7 (fio+0x0000004c4c38)
    axboe#2 parse_cmd_line /home/fio/init.c:2710:15 (fio+0x0000004ce8e5)
    axboe#3 parse_options /home/fio/init.c:2828:14 (fio+0x0000004cf3da)
    axboe#4 main /home/fio/fio.c:47:6 (fio+0x00000054b991)

  Thread T4 (tid=23785, finished) created by main thread at:
    #0 pthread_create /home/clang-3.9/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors.cc:902 (fio+0x00000042c9a6)
    axboe#1 fio_monotonic_clocktest /home/fio/gettime.c:697:7 (fio+0x0000004c4c38)
    axboe#2 parse_cmd_line /home/fio/init.c:2710:15 (fio+0x0000004ce8e5)
    axboe#3 parse_options /home/fio/init.c:2828:14 (fio+0x0000004cf3da)
    axboe#4 main /home/fio/fio.c:47:6 (fio+0x00000054b991)

SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: data race /home/fio/gettime.c:567:13 in atomic32_inc_return

Avoid accessing t->seq directly and use __sync_val_compare_and_swap to
get at it. This shuts up the sanitizer, makes the test work on Windows
and hopefully means the appropriate memory fencing will be in place
preventing unwanted compiler or CPU reordering.

Fixes: axboe#479

Signed-off-by: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
sitsofe added a commit to sitsofe/fio that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2017
fio on Windows with a 16 or 32 CPUs frequently fails while running

./fio --cpuclock-test

even though "reliable_tsc: yes" is reported. Using clang's thread sanitizer via

CC=clang ./configure --extra-cflags="-fsanitize=thread"

and running the same on Linux also generates multiple warnings similar to the
following on a VM with 16 cores:

WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=23780)
  Atomic write of size 4 at 0x7ffecb865a3c by thread T15 (mutexes: write M169):
    #0 __tsan_atomic32_fetch_add /home/clang-3.9/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interface_atomic.cc:591 (fio+0x000000471505)
    axboe#1 atomic32_inc_return /home/fio/gettime.c:567:13 (fio+0x0000004c56c1)
    axboe#2 clock_thread_fn /home/fio/gettime.c:607 (fio+0x0000004c56c1)

  Previous read of size 4 at 0x7ffecb865a3c by thread T4 (mutexes: write M147):
    #0 clock_thread_fn /home/fio/gettime.c:611:19 (fio+0x0000004c56e2)

  Location is stack of main thread.

  Mutex M169 (0x7d700000f6a0) created at:
    #0 pthread_mutex_init /home/clang-3.9/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors.cc:1119 (fio+0x00000043b695)
    axboe#1 fio_monotonic_clocktest /home/fio/gettime.c:694:3 (fio+0x0000004c4c12)
    axboe#2 parse_cmd_line /home/fio/init.c:2710:15 (fio+0x0000004ce8e5)
    axboe#3 parse_options /home/fio/init.c:2828:14 (fio+0x0000004cf3da)
    axboe#4 main /home/fio/fio.c:47:6 (fio+0x00000054b991)

  Mutex M147 (0x7d700000f178) created at:
    #0 pthread_mutex_init /home/clang-3.9/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors.cc:1119 (fio+0x00000043b695)
    axboe#1 fio_monotonic_clocktest /home/fio/gettime.c:694:3 (fio+0x0000004c4c12)
    axboe#2 parse_cmd_line /home/fio/init.c:2710:15 (fio+0x0000004ce8e5)
    axboe#3 parse_options /home/fio/init.c:2828:14 (fio+0x0000004cf3da)
    axboe#4 main /home/fio/fio.c:47:6 (fio+0x00000054b991)

  Thread T15 (tid=23796, running) created by main thread at:
    #0 pthread_create /home/clang-3.9/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors.cc:902 (fio+0x00000042c9a6)
    axboe#1 fio_monotonic_clocktest /home/fio/gettime.c:697:7 (fio+0x0000004c4c38)
    axboe#2 parse_cmd_line /home/fio/init.c:2710:15 (fio+0x0000004ce8e5)
    axboe#3 parse_options /home/fio/init.c:2828:14 (fio+0x0000004cf3da)
    axboe#4 main /home/fio/fio.c:47:6 (fio+0x00000054b991)

  Thread T4 (tid=23785, finished) created by main thread at:
    #0 pthread_create /home/clang-3.9/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors.cc:902 (fio+0x00000042c9a6)
    axboe#1 fio_monotonic_clocktest /home/fio/gettime.c:697:7 (fio+0x0000004c4c38)
    axboe#2 parse_cmd_line /home/fio/init.c:2710:15 (fio+0x0000004ce8e5)
    axboe#3 parse_options /home/fio/init.c:2828:14 (fio+0x0000004cf3da)
    axboe#4 main /home/fio/fio.c:47:6 (fio+0x00000054b991)

SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: data race /home/fio/gettime.c:567:13 in atomic32_inc_return

Fix the above by doing the following:

- Add a configure check for __sync_val_compare_and_swap and add a helper
  atomic32_cas_return that uses it.
- Add comments noting that the atomic32_* functions act as full
  barriers.
- Don't access t->seq directly when protecting a critical region and
  instead use the atomic32_* helpers to update/read it.

The above fixes the sanitizer warnings and makes the test pass on
Windows.

Fixes: axboe#479

Signed-off-by: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
sitsofe added a commit to sitsofe/fio that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2018
Compiling with
CC=clang ./configure --extra-cflags='-fsanitize=thread'
make
and then running
./fio --cpuclock-test
generates warnings like

WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: unlock of an unlocked mutex (or by a wrong thread) (pid=324)
    #0 pthread_mutex_unlock <null> (fio+0x44ce3e)
    axboe#1 clock_thread_fn gettime.c:604:2 (fio+0x4d16c6)

  Location is heap block of size 480 at 0x7b5000000000 allocated by main thread:
    #0 malloc <null> (fio+0x42ea4b)
    axboe#1 fio_monotonic_clocktest gettime.c:690:13 (fio+0x4d0b1a)
    axboe#2 parse_cmd_line init.c:2792:15 (fio+0x4dad0b)
    axboe#3 parse_options init.c:2920:14 (fio+0x4db7b7)
    axboe#4 main fio.c:47 (fio+0x4247fa)

  Mutex M142 (0x7b5000000038) created at:
    #0 pthread_mutex_init <null> (fio+0x42f6ba)
    axboe#1 fio_monotonic_clocktest gettime.c:706:3 (fio+0x4d0c03)
    axboe#2 parse_cmd_line init.c:2792:15 (fio+0x4dad0b)
    axboe#3 parse_options init.c:2920:14 (fio+0x4db7b7)
    axboe#4 main fio.c:47 (fio+0x4247fa)

SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: unlock of an unlocked mutex (or by a wrong thread) (fio+0x44ce3e) in __interceptor_pthread_mutex_unlock

valgrind --tool=helgrind ./fio --cpuclock-test
shows a similar warning:

==6607== Thread axboe#3 unlocked lock at 0x639A730 currently held by thread axboe#1
==6607==    at 0x4C3233B: mutex_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:1094)
==6607==    by 0x4C35CE7: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:1115)
==6607==    by 0x41B872: clock_thread_fn (gettime.c:604)
==6607==    by 0x4C349E1: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389)
==6607==    by 0x59A836C: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.25.so)
==6607==    by 0x5ED4B4E: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.25.so)
==6607==  Lock at 0x639A730 was first observed
==6607==    at 0x4C35CA3: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:787)
==6607==    by 0x41D2DA: fio_monotonic_clocktest (gettime.c:706)
==6607==    by 0x4232EC: parse_cmd_line (init.c:2792)
==6607==    by 0x424372: parse_options (init.c:2920)
==6607==    by 0x40E2EA: main (fio.c:47)
==6607==  Address 0x639a730 is 176 bytes inside a block of size 480 alloc'd
==6607==    at 0x4C2EF7B: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
==6607==    by 0x41D227: fio_monotonic_clocktest (gettime.c:690)
==6607==    by 0x4232EC: parse_cmd_line (init.c:2792)
==6607==    by 0x424372: parse_options (init.c:2920)
==6607==    by 0x40E2EA: main (fio.c:47)
==6607==  Block was alloc'd by thread axboe#1

This first issue ("unlock of an unlocked mutex (or by a wrong thread)
t->started") occurs because fio uses a mutexes to arrange for all the
cycle measurement threads to start their timing together but
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/pthread_mutex_lock.html
warns: "If a thread attempts to unlock a mutex that it has not locked or
a mutex which is unlocked, undefined behavior results". Address this by
reworking fio to use a condition plus a condition variable to signal all
threads when its safe to proceed.

ThreadSanitizer has a second warning too:

==================
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=324)
  Read of size 4 at 0x7ffffceafdf4 by thread T2 (mutexes: write M143):
    #0 clock_thread_fn gettime.c:614:10 (fio+0x4d1743)

  Previous atomic write of size 4 at 0x7ffffceafdf4 by thread T1 (mutexes: write M141):
    #0 __tsan_atomic32_compare_exchange_val <null> (fio+0x479237)
    axboe#1 atomic32_compare_and_swap gettime.c:576:9 (fio+0x4d1785)
    axboe#2 clock_thread_fn gettime.c:619 (fio+0x4d1785)

  Location is stack of main thread.

  Mutex M143 (0x7b5000000088) created at:
    #0 pthread_mutex_init <null> (fio+0x42f6ba)
    axboe#1 fio_monotonic_clocktest gettime.c:705:3 (fio+0x4d0bf7)
    axboe#2 parse_cmd_line init.c:2792:15 (fio+0x4dad0b)
    axboe#3 parse_options init.c:2920:14 (fio+0x4db7b7)
    axboe#4 main fio.c:47 (fio+0x4247fa)

  Mutex M141 (0x7b5000000010) created at:
    #0 pthread_mutex_init <null> (fio+0x42f6ba)
    axboe#1 fio_monotonic_clocktest gettime.c:705:3 (fio+0x4d0bf7)
    axboe#2 parse_cmd_line init.c:2792:15 (fio+0x4dad0b)
    axboe#3 parse_options init.c:2920:14 (fio+0x4db7b7)
    axboe#4 main fio.c:47 (fio+0x4247fa)

  Thread T2 (tid=327, running) created by main thread at:
    #0 pthread_create <null> (fio+0x42f3c6)
    axboe#1 fio_monotonic_clocktest gettime.c:708:7 (fio+0x4d0c20)
    axboe#2 parse_cmd_line init.c:2792:15 (fio+0x4dad0b)
    axboe#3 parse_options init.c:2920:14 (fio+0x4db7b7)
    axboe#4 main fio.c:47 (fio+0x4247fa)

  Thread T1 (tid=326, running) created by main thread at:
    #0 pthread_create <null> (fio+0x42f3c6)
    axboe#1 fio_monotonic_clocktest gettime.c:708:7 (fio+0x4d0c20)
    axboe#2 parse_cmd_line init.c:2792:15 (fio+0x4dad0b)
    axboe#3 parse_options init.c:2920:14 (fio+0x4db7b7)
    axboe#4 main fio.c:47 (fio+0x4247fa)

SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: data race gettime.c:614:10 in clock_thread_fn

The second issue ("t->seq data race") seems to be because mixing atomic
and non-atomic operations on the same address might not be safe (e.g.
the compiler may be allowed to make dangerous optimisations). Fix this
waring by using a __sync_fetch_and_add() to do the read and remove the
no longer needed __sync_synchronize().

Signed-off-by: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
@ghost ghost mentioned this pull request Feb 7, 2020
axboe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2020
The test case #3 checks that the read workload for empty zones ends
without reading any data. When zonemode=zbd, it is expected for both
regular block devices and zoned block devices. However, the test case
allowed for regular block devices to read data from empty zones. Remove
this special pass condition for regular block devices.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
lukaszstolarczuk pushed a commit to lukaszstolarczuk/fio that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2020
…-cleanup

rpma: librpma-server setup and cleanup (including connection)
rbates0119 pushed a commit to rbates0119/fio that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2020
The test case axboe#3 checks that the read workload for empty zones ends
without reading any data. When zonemode=zbd, it is expected for both
regular block devices and zoned block devices. However, the test case
allowed for regular block devices to read data from empty zones. Remove
this special pass condition for regular block devices.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
sitsofe added a commit to sitsofe/fio that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2021
Google's OSS-fuzz turned up a heap overrun when substituting keywords in
job files. To reproduce compile fio with address sanitizer options like
the following

LDFLAGS="-fsanitize=address" ./configure --disable-optimizations \
  --extra-cflags="-fsanitize=address"

The issue is demonstrated by the following job:

% printf '[t]\ndescription=$ncpus_' | fio --parse-only -
opt = 'description=$ncpus'
=================================================================
==22547==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x603000001863 at pc 0x000107a833c9 bp 0x7ffee82ac260 sp 0x7ffee82ac258
READ of size 1 at 0x603000001863 thread T0
    #0 0x107a833c8 in fio_keyword_replace options.c:5124
    axboe#1 0x107a7c6ab in dup_and_sub_options options.c:5158
    axboe#2 0x107a7bb4f in fio_options_parse options.c:5203
    axboe#3 0x1079b2214 in __parse_jobs_ini init.c:2076
    axboe#4 0x1079aff07 in parse_jobs_ini init.c:2127
    axboe#5 0x1079b7501 in parse_options init.c:2989
    axboe#6 0x107b876a4 in main fio.c:42
    axboe#7 0x7fff702f1cc8 in start (libdyld.dylib:x86_64+0x1acc8)

Fix the thinko (because opt is pointing to a later position) and
rearrange some code to make it clearer that olen is being used as an
initial offset

Signed-off-by: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
sitsofe added a commit to sitsofe/fio that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2021
Google's OSS-fuzz turned up a buffer overrun with value of the filename
option due to an overrun in a MAX_PATH sized buffer. To reproduce
compile fio with address sanitizer options like the following

LDFLAGS="-fsanitize=address" ./configure --disable-optimizations \
      --extra-cflags="-fsanitize=address"

The issue is demonstrated by the following job:

% COUNT=$(getconf PATH_MAX /); printf "[t]\nfilename=%${COUNT}s" \
  | sed 's/ /@/g' | fio --parse-only -
=================================================================
==45748==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7ffee8e35780 at pc 0x00010735a343 bp 0x7ffee8e35270 sp 0x7ffee8e34a08
WRITE of size 1025 at 0x7ffee8e35780 thread T0
    #0 0x10735a342 in wrap_vsprintf (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:x86_64h+0x22342)
    axboe#1 0x10735a9ac in wrap_sprintf (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:x86_64h+0x229ac)
    axboe#2 0x106e83b01 in add_file filesetup.c:1656
    axboe#3 0x106ee8c87 in str_filename_cb options.c:1320
    axboe#4 0x106ee1b44 in __handle_option parse.c:792
    axboe#5 0x106ed99ad in handle_option parse.c:1014
    axboe#6 0x106eda07d in parse_option parse.c:1184
    axboe#7 0x106ef10ea in fio_options_parse options.c:5199
    axboe#8 0x106e27684 in __parse_jobs_ini init.c:2076
    axboe#9 0x106e25377 in parse_jobs_ini init.c:2127
    axboe#10 0x106e2c971 in parse_options init.c:2989
    axboe#11 0x106ffc884 in main fio.c:42
    axboe#12 0x7fff702f1cc8 in start (libdyld.dylib:x86_64+0x1acc8)

Address 0x7ffee8e35780 is located in stack of thread T0 at offset 1056 in frame
    #0 0x106e836ef in add_file filesetup.c:1644

  This frame has 1 object(s):
    [32, 1056) 'file_name' (line 1646) <== Memory access at offset 1056 overflows this variable

Return an error message to the user by doing the following:

- Allow "regular" string options to have a maxlen parameter
- Set the filename option to have a maxlen of MAX_PATH

Signed-off-by: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
axboe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2021
Test cases #3, #4, #28, #29 and #48 require rather large numbers of
sequential zones to run properly and they fail if the test target
device has not enough of such zones in its zone configuration.

Check how many sequential zones are present on the test device and
skip any test cases for which this number is not enough.

Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Fomichev <dmitry.fomichev@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
dmitry-fomichev pushed a commit to dmitry-fomichev/fio that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2021
Test cases axboe#3, axboe#4, axboe#28, axboe#29 and axboe#48 require rather large numbers of
sequential zones to run properly and they fail if the test target
device has not enough of such zones in its zone configuration.

Check how many sequential zones are present on the test device and
skip any test cases for which this number is not enough.

Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Fomichev <dmitry.fomichev@wdc.com>
dmitry-fomichev pushed a commit to dmitry-fomichev/fio that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2021
Test cases axboe#3, axboe#4, axboe#28, axboe#29 and axboe#48 require rather large numbers of
sequential zones to run properly and they fail if the test target
device has not enough of such zones in its zone configuration.

Check how many sequential zones are present on the test device and
skip any test cases for which this number is not enough.

Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Fomichev <dmitry.fomichev@wdc.com>
floatious added a commit to floatious/fio that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2021
Fix the following LeakSanitizer warnings:

Indirect leak of 224 byte(s) in 7 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f7377b21bc8 in malloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10dbc8)
    axboe#1 0x563951e5e09d in add_to_dump_list /home/nks/src/fio/parse.c:1135
    axboe#2 0x563951e5e09d in add_to_dump_list /home/nks/src/fio/parse.c:1127
    axboe#3 0x563951e5e09d in parse_cmd_option /home/nks/src/fio/parse.c:1162

Indirect leak of 43 byte(s) in 7 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f7377aaa3dd in strdup (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x963dd)
    axboe#1 0x563951e5e0a8 in add_to_dump_list /home/nks/src/fio/parse.c:1136
    axboe#2 0x563951e5e0a8 in add_to_dump_list /home/nks/src/fio/parse.c:1127
    axboe#3 0x563951e5e0a8 in parse_cmd_option /home/nks/src/fio/parse.c:1162

Indirect leak of 36 byte(s) in 7 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f7377aaa3dd in strdup (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x963dd)
    axboe#1 0x563951e5e0b9 in add_to_dump_list /home/nks/src/fio/parse.c:1138
    axboe#2 0x563951e5e0b9 in add_to_dump_list /home/nks/src/fio/parse.c:1127
    axboe#3 0x563951e5e0b9 in parse_cmd_option /home/nks/src/fio/parse.c:1162

by moving fio_dump_options_free() to options.h,
so that we can call it during exit.

Reproducer:
LD_PRELOAD=libasan.so.5 fio --name=test --filename=/dev/nullb0 --runtime=2

Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@wdc.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant