-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hardware Report: packet.net #44
Comments
DOC: Updated README w/ issue #44 (cloud)
Quick update - Packet does provide SGX enabled machines using our reserved hardware model. We are working on an API update to support enabling/disabled SGX at provision time. This should be released in Q4 2018. |
Here's the report from a c1.small instance @ Packet : eax: 906e9 ebx: 7100800 ecx: 7ffafbff edx: bfebfbff Extended feature bits (EAX=07H, ECX=0H) CPUID Leaf 12H, Sub-Leaf 0 of Intel SGX Capabilities (EAX=12H,ECX=0) CPUID Leaf 12H, Sub-Leaf 1 of Intel SGX Capabilities (EAX=12H,ECX=1) CPUID Leaf 12H, Sub-Leaf 2 of Intel SGX Capabilities (EAX=12H,ECX=2) CPUID Leaf 12H, Sub-Leaf 3 of Intel SGX Capabilities (EAX=12H,ECX=3) CPUID Leaf 12H, Sub-Leaf 4 of Intel SGX Capabilities (EAX=12H,ECX=4) CPUID Leaf 12H, Sub-Leaf 5 of Intel SGX Capabilities (EAX=12H,ECX=5) CPUID Leaf 12H, Sub-Leaf 6 of Intel SGX Capabilities (EAX=12H,ECX=6) CPUID Leaf 12H, Sub-Leaf 7 of Intel SGX Capabilities (EAX=12H,ECX=7) CPUID Leaf 12H, Sub-Leaf 8 of Intel SGX Capabilities (EAX=12H,ECX=8) CPUID Leaf 12H, Sub-Leaf 9 of Intel SGX Capabilities (EAX=12H,ECX=9) |
Great! Feel free to reference documentation for SGX on packet.net |
packet.net offers Trusted Compute: a cryptographic chain of trust from hardware to the distributed cluster. Yet, not all of the 9 CPU configurations that they offer under this service are Intel-based, and only one is SGX-capable:
C1.SMALL.X86
based on aE3-1240 v5
CPU.As of April 2018, in talking with their customer and technical support teams, they provided a quote for $270/month with a one-year contract and a 30-day cancellation for a dedicated
C1.SMALL.X86
bare metal server, a very similar quote to what IBM quoted at the same time for the same specs.Yet, when querying further about the feasibility of them enabling SGX through the BIOS when provisioning these dedicated servers, I got a more discouraging response:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: