Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct IBM Cloud links #46

Closed
t-j-h opened this issue Jun 11, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Correct IBM Cloud links #46

t-j-h opened this issue Jun 11, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@t-j-h
Copy link

t-j-h commented Jun 11, 2018

https://www.ibm.com/blogs/bluemix/2018/05/data-use-protection-ibm-cloud-using-intel-sgx/ is the right link to be using for IBM Cloud SGX capable machines.

IBM Cloud Data Guard is an entirely different thing - it is not general purpose enclave access - it is a service using SGX - not offering SGX itself.

@ayeks
Copy link
Owner

ayeks commented Jun 23, 2018

Hi, I believe you can use the bare metal instances for running SGX and the IBM Cloud Data Guard which utilizes SGX for container applications.

Cloud Data Guard provides services and toolkits to transform containerized applications into protected counterparts enabling organizations with sensitive data to leverage cloud computing.

Source: https://www.ibmdataguard.com/

So I will add your link to the Readme. Thanks!

@t-j-h
Copy link
Author

t-j-h commented Jun 24, 2018

Your readme still remains incorrect.

"The last hope for SGX in the cloud is the IBM Bluemix Cloud Data Guard. Feel free to sign up here and please report back to us if you are able to execute SGX in their environment."

This is simply wrong - in that the IBM Bluemix Cloud Data Guard is a service - not a platform. The other link I provided you with is actually a platform. You can sign up for bare metal instances. That is what your table should link to.

ayeks added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2018
@ayeks
Copy link
Owner

ayeks commented Jun 26, 2018

I modified the text. Feel free to contribute via merge requests at any time if you have further improvements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants