-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Correct IBM Cloud links #46
Comments
Hi, I believe you can use the bare metal instances for running SGX and the IBM Cloud Data Guard which utilizes SGX for container applications.
Source: https://www.ibmdataguard.com/ So I will add your link to the Readme. Thanks! |
Your readme still remains incorrect. "The last hope for SGX in the cloud is the IBM Bluemix Cloud Data Guard. Feel free to sign up here and please report back to us if you are able to execute SGX in their environment." This is simply wrong - in that the IBM Bluemix Cloud Data Guard is a service - not a platform. The other link I provided you with is actually a platform. You can sign up for bare metal instances. That is what your table should link to. |
I modified the text. Feel free to contribute via merge requests at any time if you have further improvements. |
https://www.ibm.com/blogs/bluemix/2018/05/data-use-protection-ibm-cloud-using-intel-sgx/ is the right link to be using for IBM Cloud SGX capable machines.
IBM Cloud Data Guard is an entirely different thing - it is not general purpose enclave access - it is a service using SGX - not offering SGX itself.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: