Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Processing 2.0b9 #25

Closed
estzi opened this issue May 22, 2013 · 7 comments
Closed

Processing 2.0b9 #25

estzi opened this issue May 22, 2013 · 7 comments

Comments

@estzi
Copy link

estzi commented May 22, 2013

Hi! This runs great in 2.0b8 but has problems in 2.0b9 because of a bug with the command line tools. Here's a way it was solved:
processing/processing#1787

@b-g
Copy link
Owner

b-g commented May 22, 2013

thanks for documenting it here! i hope this command line tools issues are solved with the final 2.0 version. will leave this issue open until then (or a new beta shows up).

@hype
Copy link

hype commented May 23, 2013

should we jump back to b8 or is there a way to add this command line fix to b9 + sublime ?

@b-g
Copy link
Owner

b-g commented May 23, 2013

yes ... i think it is the easiest solution :( i suppose they simply forgot to check whether the command line tool works properly with p9. i prefer to wait with p8, but apparently the workaround is to edit /usr/bin/processing-java, see processing/processing#1787 (comment).

sorry.

@hype
Copy link

hype commented May 23, 2013

thanks b-g I think I will do the same I tried to get the #1787 edit to work, without success.

@sspboyd
Copy link

sspboyd commented Jun 4, 2013

The Processing 2.0 release has fixed this issue for me.
https://processing.org/download/?processing

@b-g
Copy link
Owner

b-g commented Jun 4, 2013

@sspboyd thanks for the feedback! :) will close the issue!

@b-g b-g closed this as completed Jun 4, 2013
@hype
Copy link

hype commented Jun 4, 2013

thanks everybody - will switch over today and report if anything goes awry.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants