-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
| alternate choice operator #146
Comments
b3b00
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 2, 2020
b3b00
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 2, 2020
b3b00
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 2, 2020
Love this addition! Would it be possible to add ignore [d] to a group or alternate choice containing only terminals? Like this? |
it could be done even if it is not that simple. i will not look at it right now though |
done, finally not that complicated. Only terminal alternative are discardable. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
only for items of the same type : terminals or non-terminals. mixing both is forbiden.this only two keep visitor arguments simple.
for each choice generate a new rule ? beware cartesian products when many alternate in same rule.
or maybe simpler add a new clause type, just like option or group
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: