-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
. #56
Comments
We could not detect a valid reproduction link. Make sure to follow the bug report template carefully. Why was this issue closed?To be able to investigate, we need access to a reproduction to identify what triggered the issue. We need a link to a public GitHub repository (template for App Router, template for Pages Router), but you can also use these templates: CodeSandbox: App Router or CodeSandbox: Pages Router. The bug template that you filled out has a section called "Link to the code that reproduces this issue", which is where you should provide the link to the reproduction.
What should I do?Depending on the reason the issue was closed, you can do the following:
In general, assume that we should not go through a lengthy onboarding process at your company code only to be able to verify an issue. My repository is private and cannot make it publicIn most cases, a private repo will not be a sufficient minimal reproduction, as this codebase might contain a lot of unrelated parts that would make our investigation take longer. Please do not make it public. Instead, create a new repository using the templates above, adding the relevant code to reproduce the issue. Common things to look out for:
I did not open this issue, but it is relevant to me, what can I do to help?Anyone experiencing the same issue is welcome to provide a minimal reproduction following the above steps by opening a new issue. I think my reproduction is good enough, why aren't you looking into it quickly?We look into every Next.js issue and constantly monitor open issues for new comments. However, sometimes we might miss one or two due to the popularity/high traffic of the repository. We apologize, and kindly ask you to refrain from tagging core maintainers, as that will usually not result in increased priority. Upvoting issues to show your interest will help us prioritize and address them as quickly as possible. That said, every issue is important to us, and if an issue gets closed by accident, we encourage you to open a new one linking to the old issue and we will look into it. Useful Resources |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
We cannot recreate the issue with the provided information. Please add a reproduction in order for us to be able to investigate. Why was this issue marked with the
|
### What? Moving maintenance to a separate repository. ### Why? I want to make these actions reusable in other projects as they seem to work well in the Next.js repository. ### How? The code is moved to https://github.com/balazsorban44/nissuer I tested it on my fork, and all the following functionality is preserved: balazsorban44#56 - [x] Close/lock/comment without a valid reproduction link - [x] Minimize "+1" - [x] Add labels based on user selection - [x] Add comment based on the maintainer's label (eg.: "please add a complete reproduction")
Link to the code that reproduces this issue
.
To Reproduce
.
Current vs. Expected behavior
.
Verify canary release
Provide environment information
.
Which area(s) are affected? (Select all that apply)
App Router
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: