Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[bug] Tree supports do not work with support enforcers #2045

Closed
2 tasks done
Antyos opened this issue Jul 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

[bug] Tree supports do not work with support enforcers #2045

Antyos opened this issue Jul 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
@tangketan
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@Antyos
Copy link

Antyos commented Jul 14, 2023

Bambu Studio Version

1.6.2.4

Where is the application from?

Bambu Lab Official website

OS version

Windows 10

Additional system information

CPU: Intel 11th gen i9-11900H
Memory: 64 GB
GPU: Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

Printer

Bambu Lab P1P

How to reproduce

  1. Load an STL file with an overhang
  2. Add a support enforcer cube
  3. Enable supports and set the type to tree(auto) or tree(manual)

image

Actual results

The tree supports seem to create an enclosed shell around the part wherever the support enforcer is. The entire support enforcer mesh seems to be filled with support interface layers, while everything below it is regular rectilinear support.

Tree support

tree-support-issue

Using normal support works as intended. So does using tree support with paint-on supports.

Normal support

normal-support-issue

Expected results

Tree supports should only be generated under the parts of the model intersecting with the support enforcer, like with normal supports.

Project file & Debug log uploads

Overhang.zip
debug_Thu_Jul_13_20_45_54_21548.log

Checklist of files to include

  • Log file
  • Project file
@Antyos Antyos added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 14, 2023
@tangketan
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for reporting the bug. I'll fix it ASAP.

lanewei120 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 31, 2023
@ArthurBambulab @lanewei120
FIX: tree support didn't work with enforcer
1beea48 
Enforcers should also subtract the lower polygons to get overhang areas.

Jira: STUDIO-3692
Github: #2045
Change-Id: I70f4aaae13826efc624e9bc942d2d11e9b1df1a1
(cherry picked from commit fc3d9b24ac1eb14e259488c94fca3469f319b368)
lanewei120 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 31, 2023
@ArthurBambulab @lanewei120
FIX: tree support didn't work with enforcer
9d96731 
Enforcers should also subtract the lower polygons to get overhang areas.

Jira: STUDIO-3692
Github: #2045
Change-Id: I70f4aaae13826efc624e9bc942d2d11e9b1df1a1
(cherry picked from commit fc3d9b24ac1eb14e259488c94fca3469f319b368)
@tangketan
Copy link
Collaborator

Fix included in Studio V1.7.

DzzD pushed a commit to DzzD/BambuStudio that referenced this issue Sep 24, 2023
@ArthurBambulab @DzzD
FIX: tree support didn't work with enforcer
fa239fe 
Enforcers should also subtract the lower polygons to get overhang areas.

Jira: STUDIO-3692
Github: bambulab#2045
Change-Id: I70f4aaae13826efc624e9bc942d2d11e9b1df1a1
(cherry picked from commit fc3d9b24ac1eb14e259488c94fca3469f319b368)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@tangketan tangketan

Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@tangketan @Antyos