Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Garbage in new_step output. #240

Closed
tfarina opened this issue Jun 11, 2015 · 8 comments
Closed

Garbage in new_step output. #240

tfarina opened this issue Jun 11, 2015 · 8 comments
Labels
P3 We're not considering working on this, but happy to review a PR. (No assignee) type: bug

Comments

@tfarina
Copy link
Contributor

tfarina commented Jun 11, 2015

I'm seeing some garbage in the output messages of new_step. It is a square with 01F 343. Sorry, I could not copy that here.

@damienmg
Copy link
Contributor

It's a UTF-8 Leaves for Bazel :)

@damienmg damienmg added the P3 We're not considering working on this, but happy to review a PR. (No assignee) label Jun 11, 2015
@damienmg damienmg self-assigned this Jun 11, 2015
@damienmg
Copy link
Contributor

🍃 Building Bazel tools...
🍃 Determinism test...
🍃 Running tests.

@kchodorow
Copy link
Contributor

We should disable for non-OS X builds, I think. Or maybe do some terminal detection, if we want to be fancy.

@damienmg
Copy link
Contributor

It works under last ubuntu. We should probably do some detection indeed.

@tfarina
Copy link
Contributor Author

tfarina commented Jun 11, 2015

Does it make a difference if running under a ssh session?

@damienmg
Copy link
Contributor

I have no problem in SSH session but it depends on wether your terminal
support displaying it and sometime SSH ttys are a bit messed up so it can

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:32 PM Thiago Farina notifications@github.com
wrote:

Does it make a difference if running under a ssh session?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#240 (comment).

Damien

@davidzchen
Copy link
Member

It would be great to do some detection.

That said, I love the new_step output. :)

@hanwen
Copy link
Contributor

hanwen commented Jan 20, 2016

I declare this 'working as intended'.

I don't think you can detect whether a remote system can display a certain unicode codepoint, since you cannot access the terminal's rendering output.

Perhaps you can file a bug with whatever terminal emulator you are using? Or with your distribution, because they don't supply a font with the right emoji's?

@hanwen hanwen closed this as completed Jan 20, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
P3 We're not considering working on this, but happy to review a PR. (No assignee) type: bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants