-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 104
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provide toolbox wrappers for some ICA algos #6
Comments
For this issue (but also for the SSD/SPoC stuff) we need to decide how to include external functions, such as ICA implementations. SPM and Fieldtrip ship the original code and simply provide wrappers to fit their toolbox conventions. I assume that would also be the way to go for us. But let's discuss it. |
For including external function, we use so far the folder |
Legally, we could include certain libraries in our toolbox if their license is compatible with ours. Unfortunately we don't have decided on a license yet (see #2). Generally speaking, code licensed under non-copyleft licenses like MIT, BSD and even the LGPL (note the leading L), can always be included. Projects licensed under a copyleft license like GPL can only be included if our project is licensed under the GPL as well. |
Personally I would not have a problem with including code from others in our git. But I guess that is something we simply have to decide. If we are going to include ICA code, then here are some options: So I guess Basti is right, we need to decide for a license for our toolbox first, before we can thing about what to include -- if we include. ;-) |
Some links, so we don't have to search again next time http://research.ics.aalto.fi/ica/fastica/ |
I separated the ICA wrapper issue from the PCA issue. PCA can be implemented by us. ICA has to be a wrapper for external code. |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: