Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PIMS-373 update @types/crypto-js from version 4.1.2 to 4.2.1 #1893

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 11, 2023
Merged

Conversation

TaylorFries
Copy link
Collaborator

@TaylorFries TaylorFries commented Nov 9, 2023

🎯 Summary

PIMS-373:

update @types/crypto-js from version 4.1.2 to 4.2.1

🔰 Checklist

  • I have read and agree with the following checklist and am following the guidelines in our Code of Conduct document.
  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation where required.
  • I have tested my changes to the best of my ability.
  • My changes generate no new warnings.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Tests label Nov 10, 2023
Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Nov 10, 2023

Code Climate has analyzed commit 91ea674 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold).

This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 55.0%.

View more on Code Climate.

@TaylorFries TaylorFries self-assigned this Nov 10, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@dbarkowsky dbarkowsky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Builds with no issues. Navigated step form where crypto-js is used. No issues.

@dbarkowsky dbarkowsky merged commit 472338c into dev Nov 11, 2023
2 checks passed
@dbarkowsky dbarkowsky deleted the PIMS-373 branch November 11, 2023 00:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants