Allow readOnly + required properties

[jpraet]

https://www.belgif.be/specification/rest/api-guide/#rule-oas-rdonly states that

Properties marked as readOnly being true SHOULD NOT be in the required list of the defined schema.

But the spec supports this: https://spec.openapis.org/oas/v3.0.3#fixed-fields-19

If the property is marked as readOnly being true and is in the required list, the required will take effect on the response only.

[pvdbosch]

We didn't include this bc of two reasons:

• it causes problems in tooling and code generation
  • e.g. @NotNull for required regardless of readOnly and no setter being generated for readOnly fields
  • maybe worthwhile to test again with latest openapi-generator release, as well as verify the atlassian swagger validator's behavior
• The interaction with "required" has been removed in OpenAPI 3.1 which the guide will probably support at some point
  • the reason being that OpenAPI 3.1 is fully supports the JSON Schema standard (i.e. no variation anymore) so it can't override "required" behavior anymore
  • cfr release notes https://www.openapis.org/blog/2020/06/18/openapi-3-1-0-rc0-its-here and Clarify spec wrt readOnly and writeOnly in referenced schemas OAI/OpenAPI-Specification#1622
  • readOnly/writeOnly in JSON Schema have deliberately more vague semantics, and don't interact with "required" anymore: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bhutton-json-schema-validation-00#section-9.4

[kernixski]

I am not convinced that json-schema-validation (still in draft) is OK. I mean: it partially removes the usefulness of eiter "readOnly"/"writeOnly" or "required". OpenAPI 3.0 spec has more sense. It will force us to create specific objects for the request and the response if we want the contract to be clear and complete, and that's really annoying.

[pvdbosch]

JSON schema seems to be perpetually draft status :)

I comprehend that JSON Schema is a standard that's unaware of request or response concepts; it only defines how a schema to validate a JSON document. It's comparable to XML Schema or Jakarta Bean Validation standards that can't express "read only" in this sense either.

It might be possible for the OpenAPI standard at some point to add an extension keyword like "requiredInResponse", but it can't override "required" from JSON Schema because that would lead to interoperability problems between the two standards; which is what we currently see in OpenAPI 3.0 and JSON Schema draft-wright-00.

[pvdbosch]

Did some tests; handling of readOnly and writeOnly seems to have been improved in recent openapi-generator (7.0.1), at least for spring and JAX-RS.
Getters/setters are always generated regardless of readOnly/writeOnly; and @NotNull only if property is required and not readOnly.

@Schema(name = "readOnlyRequiredProperty", accessMode = Schema.AccessMode.READ_ONLY, requiredMode = Schema.RequiredMode.REQUIRED)
 @JsonProperty("readOnlyRequiredProperty")
 public String getReadOnlyRequiredProperty() {
   return readOnlyRequiredProperty;
 }

 public void setReadOnlyRequiredProperty(String readOnlyRequiredProperty) {
   this.readOnlyRequiredProperty = readOnlyRequiredProperty;
 }

 @Schema(name = "writeOnlyProperty", requiredMode = Schema.RequiredMode.NOT_REQUIRED)
 @JsonProperty("writeOnlyProperty")
 public String getWriteOnlyProperty() {
   return writeOnlyProperty;
 }

 public void setWriteOnlyProperty(String writeOnlyProperty) {
   this.writeOnlyProperty = writeOnlyProperty;
 }

 @NotNull 
 @Schema(name = "requiredProperty", requiredMode = Schema.RequiredMode.REQUIRED)
 @JsonProperty("requiredProperty")
 public String getRequiredProperty() {
   return requiredProperty;
 }

 public void setRequiredProperty(String requiredProperty) {
   this.requiredProperty = requiredProperty;
 }

I'd still avoid setting readOnly on required properties, to be forward-compatible with OpenAPI 3.1.

[pvdbosch]

discussed on WG:

• add explanation for restriction in REST guide (forwards-compatibility with OAS 3.1)
• rule can be verified in styleguide-validator tool

[pvdbosch]

PR has been merged and will be published next release.