Inconsistent resolution/segments naming

[lynn-lumen]

bevy_gizmos uses the term segments to denote the amount of vertices/lines to draw for curved shapes whereas
bevy_render uses the term resolution for this purpose and denotes the amount of "cuts" along the height of shapes like Cylinders with segments.

This is kind of confusing when working with both gizmos and meshes.

let cylinder = Cylinder::default();
let mesh = cylinder.mesh().segments(5).build(); // This is a cylinder with 32 vertices per top/bottom cap
gizmos.primitive_3d(cylinder, ...).segments(5); // This is a cylinder with 5 vertices per top/bottom cap

I would prefer keeping the naming conventions of bevy_render since this would just introduce a breaking change (replacing all segments methods on gizmos with resolution) whereas keeping the naming convention of bevy_gizmos would effectively flip the meaning of segments and resolution in bevy_render and introduce a lot of silent bugs for users.

[mweatherley]

I agree that this is confusing; I want to also mention that in changing this, we should keep in mind that the mesh builders are also likely to have another parameter for subdivisions in the future (e.g. making a rectangle out of many triangles instead of just two).