Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[ADAM-1469] Don't filter on whether reads have mismatches during realignment #1470

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2017
Merged

[ADAM-1469] Don't filter on whether reads have mismatches during realignment #1470

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2017

Conversation

fnothaft
Copy link
Member

@fnothaft fnothaft commented Apr 3, 2017

Resolves #1469. Provides approximately a 1% bump in both INDEL calling precision and recall.

@fnothaft
[ADAM-1469] Don't filter on whether reads have mismatches during real…
3670c7e 
…ignment

Resolves bigdatagenomics#1469. Provides approximately a 1% bump in both INDEL calling precision
and recall.
@fnothaft fnothaft added this to the 0.22.0 milestone Apr 3, 2017
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 3, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 81.613% when pulling 3670c7e on fnothaft:issues/1469-realign-all into a70c371 on bigdatagenomics:master.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/1926/
Test PASSed.

@heuermh heuermh merged commit 8df3aa2 into bigdatagenomics:master Apr 3, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@heuermh heuermh heuermh approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.22.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@fnothaft @coveralls @AmplabJenkins @heuermh