Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

7 taxonomy summaries #168

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 23, 2015
Merged

7 taxonomy summaries #168

merged 9 commits into from
Oct 23, 2015

Conversation

wasade
Copy link
Member

@wasade wasade commented Oct 22, 2015

depends on #166 and #167

This was referenced Oct 22, 2015
@wasade wasade mentioned this pull request Oct 23, 2015
@wasade
Copy link
Member Author

wasade commented Oct 23, 2015

@mortonjt @antgonza @josenavas @ElDeveloper @squirrelo anyone able to review?

@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
In order to provide taxonomy information for participants, we need to summarize the taxonomies of the individual OTUs. Within AG and for participants, were interested in providing information at 3 levels: phylum, class and genus. These summarizations are used in different areas of the participant results.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

were -> we're

@squirrelo
Copy link
Contributor

One small text change, but 👍 otherwise

@wasade
Copy link
Member Author

wasade commented Oct 23, 2015

Thanks!

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Joshua Shorenstein <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

One small text change, but [image: 👍] otherwise


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#168 (comment).

@wasade
Copy link
Member Author

wasade commented Oct 23, 2015

good to go?

squirrelo added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2015
@squirrelo squirrelo merged commit a3fc767 into biocore:master Oct 23, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants