New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rdf output adapter #338
Rdf output adapter #338
Conversation
Bumps [pillow](https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow) from 10.0.1 to 10.3.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/blob/main/CHANGES.rst) - [Commits](python-pillow/Pillow@10.0.1...10.3.0) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: pillow dependency-type: indirect ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Bump pillow from 10.0.1 to 10.3.0
…tegrated with the config file.
…es and edges written to xml file
… type relationship and that all nodes have property "id".
first version of RDF conversion
@LoesvdBiggelaar @nilskre here is the new PR |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for addressing the feedback. @LoesvdBiggelaar
There is only one comment regarding the test left.
And one other question: How do you further process the RDF output? Do you load it into some kind of triple store / visualize it somewhere?
The context of my question is, that for the other output adapters the created Knowledge Graph can be loaded and visualized somewhere (e.g. in Neo4j or PostgreSQL). This is directly supported by BioCypher through the generated import script. I asked myself if this would somehow also be possible for RDF?
…change code in the _RDFWriter
For now you can use the ttl/xml (or other format) to load it into any application you want to use. I tested the RDFWriter by running it with the Open Targets adapter and loading the output files into GraphDB. In GraphDB I checked if I'm satisfied with my graph. I manually added other ontologies to expand my KG, which worked perfectly. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great work, thanks! @LoesvdBiggelaar
@slobentanzer From my point of view this is ready to be merged.
Thanks for the helpful explanation.
Definitely, feel free to open an issue for this. |
support issue of 3.9 with the latest macOS on GitHub runners
The PR is good, I would merge, but we have a CI issue now. Opened an issue here: #342 As soon as this is resolved, we can merge. :) |
To get this merged, I have implemented a temporary CICD-Fix. |
Many thanks both, merging now. :) |
This PR introduces an RDF output module based on
rdflib