Gold Standard relying on technologies

[jmvillaveces]

Hi, I noticed that the proposed gold standard relies a lot on technologies or packages such as D3 and travis. I think a gold standards should be generic. Something like:

1. Follows the coding style guide
2. Uses a build system
3. Implements tests
4. Uses CI
5. Its been linted
6. Its well documented

[mhelvens]

Duplicate of issue #3

[ljgarcia]

Hi all,

I agree with José, something generic would be better.
Also, I understand some of these will be used in the check list
displayed in the registry, like having tests. Is that explained somewhere?

Regards,

On 09/09/2014 09:32, jmVillaveces wrote:

Hi, I noticed that the proposed gold standard relies a lot on
technologies or packages such as D3 and travis. I think a gold
standards should be generic. Something like:

1. Follows the coding style guide
2. Uses a build system
3. Implements tests
4. Uses CI
5. Its been linted
6. Its well documented

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#8.