-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cobrapy and Cameo FVA results difference #114
Comments
Hi @MuhammedHasan! Can you run cameo method like this?
It should give you the same result. We do not fix the biomass reaction to 100% by default. I tested myself and cameo FVA is running slow. We will have a look into it ASAP. Please let me know if it solves your problem. |
Thanks for your help. |
This issue closed because it solved but another issue is opened for performance problem #117. |
Ubuntu 16.04
Python 3.5.2
solver: cplex
I have tried flux variability analysis with cameo and cobra. But their results are different. I report my experiment in this notebook.
Moreover, cameo's fva runs 10 times slower in my machine as you see in the notebook.
What is the wrong with this code?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: