Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not pay out the security deposit of the trade peer to the arbitration case winner #6411

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 26, 2022

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Nov 13, 2022

Change arbitration payout UI to implement bisq-network/proposals#386.

Amounts are filled out based on proposal 386:

  • If BTC buyer is selected as case winner they will get trade amount + buyer security deposit.
  • If BTC seller is selected as case winner they will get trade amount + seller security deposit.
  • If custom payout is selected arbitrator can specify custom amounts as they wish.

Reviewed possible scenarios with @pazza83 on a jitsi call.

@refund-agent2 ping.

Screenshots

image

image

Do not pay out the security deposit of the trade peer to the
arbitration case winner.
Amounts are filled out based on which option the
Arbitrator chooses:
If BTC buyer is selected as case winner they will get
trade amount + buyer security deposit.
If BTC seller is selected as case winner they will get
trade amount + seller security deposit.
If custom payout is selected arbitrator can specify
custom amounts as they wish.
Copy link
Collaborator

@HenrikJannsen HenrikJannsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Copy link
Contributor

@alejandrogarcia83 alejandrogarcia83 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@alejandrogarcia83 alejandrogarcia83 merged commit 8c882a7 into bisq-network:master Nov 26, 2022
@ghost ghost mentioned this pull request Dec 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants