Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For August 2018 #112

Closed
ManfredKarrer opened this issue Aug 30, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

For August 2018 #112

ManfredKarrer opened this issue Aug 30, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ManfredKarrer
Copy link
Member

ManfredKarrer commented Aug 30, 2018

Basic information

  • BSQ amount requested: 10900
  • BSQ address: B1N15prE63ZHC7grk2hyuVDLNfrQYCkDT84

Details

Development work:

Some past dev work from previous months got shipped with 0.8.0:

A big part of my dev work that month was for the DAO but as it is not shipped I do not include it to that compensation request (though its mostly merged to master).
I will consider next months to add all my past DAO work if that proposal gets accepted.

Beside that I helped @blabno with integration of the API and started review of did some refactoring.

As that work is not merged to master and not shipped I do not include it to that compensation request.

Roles:

The following are roles I am responsible for, with links to my monthly report about each.

Operator roles:

The following are roles where I play a secondary role, and do not (necessarily) do monthly reports:

Major roles:

Minor roles:

Requested for all the listed roles: 2900 BSQ

[1] https://github.com/ManfredKarrer/bisq-core/tree/voting

@cbeams
Copy link
Member

cbeams commented Sep 3, 2018

@ManfredKarrer, I just noticed that you requested BSQ for the Founder role. I've been treating that role as not applicable for compensation because it doesn't directly add value, i.e. there's nothing I really do in the specific capacity of "founder" (except write a monthly report). Everything I do that I request compensation for is in the context of some more specific role or in the context of an individual contribution of code, etc.

If you see this differently, that's fine, but we should probably be consistent about it between us.

Also, where you have "minor roles" above, do you mean "secondary roles"?

Thanks.

@ManfredKarrer
Copy link
Member Author

Ah ok. Will remove that in next request...
Re secondary role/major roles:
I wanted to separate between those secondary roles where I had considerable effort (major) and those where not (minor).

@ripcurlx
Copy link
Contributor

ripcurlx commented Sep 4, 2018

Closing as complete, see #107 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants