Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge #12127: Remove unused mempool index
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
8e617e3 Remove unused mempool index (Suhas Daftuar)

Pull request description:

  We haven't used the "mining_score" index since 0.12, so remove it.

Tree-SHA512: ae37b8663194986eaeecfc2bbeca7ecb4ae6f0d8384515fa218cbc939a580d4b9f7f997c5297c3f1b3c3a0651edb092f373ac9a4808aaec30d38cb99d5f3ed70
  • Loading branch information
laanwj committed Jan 15, 2018
2 parents 45cf8a0 + 8e617e3 commit 9501dc2
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 2 additions and 39 deletions.
29 changes: 0 additions & 29 deletions src/test/mempool_tests.cpp
Expand Up @@ -287,35 +287,6 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MempoolIndexingTest)

pool.removeRecursive(pool.mapTx.find(tx9.GetHash())->GetTx());
pool.removeRecursive(pool.mapTx.find(tx8.GetHash())->GetTx());
/* Now check the sort on the mining score index.
* Final order should be:
*
* tx7 (2M)
* tx2 (20k)
* tx4 (15000)
* tx1/tx5 (10000)
* tx3/6 (0)
* (Ties resolved by hash)
*/
sortedOrder.clear();
sortedOrder.push_back(tx7.GetHash().ToString());
sortedOrder.push_back(tx2.GetHash().ToString());
sortedOrder.push_back(tx4.GetHash().ToString());
if (tx1.GetHash() < tx5.GetHash()) {
sortedOrder.push_back(tx5.GetHash().ToString());
sortedOrder.push_back(tx1.GetHash().ToString());
} else {
sortedOrder.push_back(tx1.GetHash().ToString());
sortedOrder.push_back(tx5.GetHash().ToString());
}
if (tx3.GetHash() < tx6.GetHash()) {
sortedOrder.push_back(tx6.GetHash().ToString());
sortedOrder.push_back(tx3.GetHash().ToString());
} else {
sortedOrder.push_back(tx3.GetHash().ToString());
sortedOrder.push_back(tx6.GetHash().ToString());
}
CheckSort<mining_score>(pool, sortedOrder);
}

BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(MempoolAncestorIndexingTest)
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions src/txmempool.cpp
Expand Up @@ -906,8 +906,8 @@ bool CCoinsViewMemPool::GetCoin(const COutPoint &outpoint, Coin &coin) const {

size_t CTxMemPool::DynamicMemoryUsage() const {
LOCK(cs);
// Estimate the overhead of mapTx to be 15 pointers + an allocation, as no exact formula for boost::multi_index_contained is implemented.
return memusage::MallocUsage(sizeof(CTxMemPoolEntry) + 15 * sizeof(void*)) * mapTx.size() + memusage::DynamicUsage(mapNextTx) + memusage::DynamicUsage(mapDeltas) + memusage::DynamicUsage(mapLinks) + memusage::DynamicUsage(vTxHashes) + cachedInnerUsage;
// Estimate the overhead of mapTx to be 12 pointers + an allocation, as no exact formula for boost::multi_index_contained is implemented.
return memusage::MallocUsage(sizeof(CTxMemPoolEntry) + 12 * sizeof(void*)) * mapTx.size() + memusage::DynamicUsage(mapNextTx) + memusage::DynamicUsage(mapDeltas) + memusage::DynamicUsage(mapLinks) + memusage::DynamicUsage(vTxHashes) + cachedInnerUsage;
}

void CTxMemPool::RemoveStaged(setEntries &stage, bool updateDescendants, MemPoolRemovalReason reason) {
Expand Down
8 changes: 0 additions & 8 deletions src/txmempool.h
Expand Up @@ -287,7 +287,6 @@ class CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee
// Multi_index tag names
struct descendant_score {};
struct entry_time {};
struct mining_score {};
struct ancestor_score {};

class CBlockPolicyEstimator;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -356,7 +355,6 @@ class SaltedTxidHasher
* - transaction hash
* - feerate [we use max(feerate of tx, feerate of tx with all descendants)]
* - time in mempool
* - mining score (feerate modified by any fee deltas from PrioritiseTransaction)
*
* Note: the term "descendant" refers to in-mempool transactions that depend on
* this one, while "ancestor" refers to in-mempool transactions that a given
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -446,12 +444,6 @@ class CTxMemPool
boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>,
CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime
>,
// sorted by score (for mining prioritization)
boost::multi_index::ordered_unique<
boost::multi_index::tag<mining_score>,
boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>,
CompareTxMemPoolEntryByScore
>,
// sorted by fee rate with ancestors
boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<
boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score>,
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 9501dc2

Please sign in to comment.